| From the Galleries |
2096 pictures in 33 albums
Portraits of Aleister Crowley
 Malefic Deity I
Last Updated Picture:
 Sutekh Ammon Deith
|
|
| Statistics |
Site visits since 30 September 2003: 34,061,996 Yesterday's visits: 29,260
Registrations: Today: 6 Yesterday: 3 Overall: 7033
Newest Members:
|
|
| Random Quote |
|
The common defect of all mystical systems previous to that of the Aeon whose Law is Thelema is that there has been no place for Laughter. But the sadness of the mournful Mother and the melancholy of the dying Man are swept in the limbo of the past by the confident smile of the immortal Child.
And there is no Vision more critical in the career of the Adept of Horus than the Universal Joke.
-- Aleister Crowley
|
| |
| Australian OTO Court Case |
Posted by lashtal on in 8° : in 3° : dies : Anno IVxv (Aug 01, 2007 - 12:19 AM) |
Thanks to Steve King...
On 27 July 2007 the Deputy President of the Victorian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (VCAT), Ms Anne Coghlan, handed down her long awaited decision addressing complaints made by the Australian OTO on behalf of two of its members (David Bottrill and Brent Gray) against Vivienne Legg and Dyson Devine (under provisions of the Racial and Religious Tolerance Act). This concerned materials posted on the Devine and Legg website which vilified the OTO by claiming the Order was a protected, satanic paedophile cult operating within Australia and engaging in all manner of horrific crimes including child sexual abuse, child pornography and murder.
Legg and Devine refused to attend the proceedings, however the Tribunal was satisfied that what they published did indeed constitute religious vilification in terms of the Act, and specifically, that they incited hatred towards OTO members in their internet postings.
The decision contains clauses that give OTO injunctive relief, costs, and access to damages. We are happy with the VCAT orders and judgment.
It has been a slow and tedious road to get to this decision, with more timely work ahead. It is now two years since we first discovered the farrago of lies and vile allegations made by Devine and Legg on their website - people who subscribe to bizarre UFO and freemason/illuminati conspiracy theories – and since then we have had to put up with ongoing Internet stalking and harassment. Nevertheless, we remain committed to seeking redress to attacks on the Order and Thelema through open and fair legal process, with patience and diligence.
OTO Australia would like to thank our solicitor Cathryn Prowse of Phillips Fox DLA, who has handled this and related cases since the outset. We again extend our thanks to the international Thelemic communities and OTO members world-wide who donated to our legal fund and otherwise supported and encouraged us, as well as the webmasters of lashtal.com who have allowed us to present news of our cases to Thelemites via their website. Grand Lodge also thanks Brothers Bottrill and Gray, who were prepared to put their names, careers and privacy on the line to defend the good name of the Order, our members and their families, and Thelema.
The full text of the Tribunal decision is here attached and includes an overview and background to the OTO’s VCAT cases. An archive of press releases and other materials relating to these and associated cases can be found at www.otoaustralia.org.au.
       
|
|
|
|
| Australian OTO Court Case | Log-in or register a new user account | 7 Comments |
|
| Comments are statements made by the person that posted them. They do not necessarily represent the opinions of the site editor. |
Re: Australian OTO Court Case
by jcyn1973 on Aug 01, 2007 - 04:39 AM (User information
|
|
Good news ! Glad to hear it, a nice tactical strike on the third eye of ignorance
|
Re: Australian OTO Court Case
by hyperion192 on Aug 01, 2007 - 11:51 AM (User information
|
|
Excellent news! Shame it always take an inordinate effort to counteract the effects of slander & the like.
|
Re: Australian OTO Court Case
by ianrons on Aug 02, 2007 - 10:57 PM (User information http://www.themagickalreview.org/)
|
|
Referring back to the "gaiaguys" website today, I was astounded to see that they still haven't removed the offending material, and it seems they have no immediate intention of doing so. It also seems from their website that they can't and/or won't pay costs & damages. I suppose, then, that this matter will continue to rumble on. Best of luck!
|
|
|