Posted by Caradoc on Jan 10, 2005 - 02:46 PM
Your rating:

---

PLEASE NOTE the following are my own thoughts after finishing my first (and probably my last) reading of this book.  They are not meant as a thorough review and do not reflect anyone's ideas but my own.

I've just finished reading this book and, while I did enjoy most of it, I do have a few complaints.

In the first section of the book, the author states that Mozart may have been a member of the Bavarian Illuminati.  I liked that.  If it can't be proven then it must be stated as a possibility.  I've read a lot of sensationalist writings o­n the Illuminati and they nearly all claim any remote possibility as a stone cold fact.  This gave me confidence in the author.  A few pages later however, the author clearly indicates that Mozart was a member of the Illuminati, dropping the 'maybe' altogether.  I began to have my doubts.

When the author writes that "One assumes [Ekharthausen] wouldn't have cherished the idea that as 'satanic' a figure as Crowley was inspired by his devotional tract," and, in a footnote, describes Aleister Crowley as "An altogether more Satanic character [than Baudelaire]," my doubts grew further.  In the section o­n Aleister Crowley the author does make a point of saying Crowley was "Technically not a black magician," though he does follow this up by stating that there was, "Little of the Light about him."  The following quote I just found offensive...

Crowley claimed that the Book of the Law was unlike any of his previous writings and clearly showed an alien hand.  Any reader of Crowley's poetry will find this difficult to accept.

I believe I've read every piece of Crowley's published poetry, and I have no difficulty accepting that the Book of The Law was 'written by an alien hand'.  The author spends an inordinate amount of space o­n 'what a bad poet Crowley was', even taking the time to tell us all that Martin Booth's assessment of Jephthah was just wrong, a very strange thing for someone who is trying to demonstrate a knowledge of poetry to say.

The author also includes various much-repeated fantasies, such as JFC Fuller being the o­nly Englishman to attend Hitler's birthday party (he was the o­nly Englishman invited to the party, an invitation which he declined).  There were many, many more errors and reprinted lies but I think I've made my point already. 

All in all I would say that the book is a good, fun introduction to various 'occult personalities' but o­nce you've found an interesting personality, look for a more reliable book about him and take anything in the Dedalus Book of the Occult with a kilo of salt.  A couple of things the book would benefit from are a Bibliography (so you can easily find those more reliable books) and an Index.

Caradoc