Menu
   
From the Galleries

2088 pictures in 33 albums


Photographs of Aleister Crowley




Last Updated Picture:

Allan Bennett
Allan Bennett

   
From the Bibliography

759 entries  •  1603 images  •  158 user notes



Little Poems in Prose (1995)
from OKontrair


Most recent image:


Ecclesia Gnostica Catholica (1998)
from moyal


Recent edits:  Das Beste von Frie… (1997)
 Der Kleine Theodor… (1993)
 In Nomine Demiurgi… (2010)
 Geheimnisse der Se… (2007)
 Ein Leben für die … (1995)

   
Articles
Media Articles
 Aleister Crowley
 Kenneth Anger

Lairs and Locations
 Boleskine House
 Cefalu, Sicily

Texts
 Background
 Documents

LAShTAL.COM
 Administration
 
5 latest pages
 Sybarite Among The…
 007 and 666: A Tru…
 Cefalu in FAZ
 Picture Post: 26 N…
 Picture Post: 19 N…
 
   
Statistics

Site visits since 30 September 2003:
33,853,032
Yesterday's visits:
22,063


Registrations:
Today:  2
Yesterday:  6
Overall:  6999

Newest Members:
odion
lnkqbll
Niggurath
SpaceGoat
supernovax
   
Recent Links
   
Random Quote

I never saw a wild thing sorry for itself. A small bird will drop frozen dead from a bough Without ever having felt sorry for itself.

-- D H Lawrence
   

1910 - The Times

.: Publication date 17-Jun-2004 :: Reads: 1831 :: Print current page :: Print all:.
KINGS BENCH DIVISION

"THE EQUINOX"

Jones V The Looking Glass Publishing Company (Limited) And Others

(Before Mr. Justice Scrutton and a Common Jury.)

This was an action for damages for an alleged libel appearing in the Looking Glass of November 26, 1910, which commenced yesterday and concluded today. The action was brought by Mr. George Cecil Jones, a consulting chemist, against the publishers, editor, and printers of the paper known as The Looking Glass, in respect of certain statements connecting him with one Crowley, who was alleged to be a person of disgraceful and criminal character, who was alleged to be the founder of a sect styled "The Equinox".

Mr. Simmons appeared for the plaintiff; Mr. Shiller represented the publishers; and Mr. Rowlands appeared for the printers. His Lordship said that as regards some of the accusations against Crowley no evidence had been offered, but it had been shown that he wrote, published, and advertised literature of a most disgusting character and conduct. He should leave them three questions :-

1. Were the words and statements complained of defamatory of the plaintiff?

2. If yes,were the statements of fact substantially true?

3. If yes, were the comments founded on those statements of fact fair?

The jury answered all three questions in the affirmitive, and on those findings judgement was entered for the defendants. Solicitors :- Bullock and Co.; S.B. Gottlieb; White and Leonard.



LAShTAL
The Thelemic News and Culture web site. Updated daily
Home of The Aleister Crowley Society
Copyright 1998-2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, 2008, 2009, 2010
The Owner and Editor of LAShTAL and Chairman of The Aleister Crowley Society is Paul Feazey
RSS Feeds: Main Feed | Forums

nanny