Kill me/Fill debacl...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Kill me/Fill debacle me as latent homosexual repression  

  RSS

Anonymous
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
20/03/2014 12:49 pm  

93

Is it possible that the male hetero ego has a fear , unconscious or not, of being "filled" from behind, and they therefore have an averse reaction to the original text to the extent that they are compelled to damage it?  A hetero woman would not have such a fear.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BJIqnXTqg8I

93 93/93


Quote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
20/03/2014 2:49 pm  

Interesting point David, most hetrosexual males would probably much prefer to be 'killed' rather than 'filled'.


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
20/03/2014 7:05 pm  

I consider myself as a human to be bisexual. Setting aside the fact that I have never met a man I want to have any sexual relations with I loathe homophobia, I find it childish and small minded.

🙂
93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
Anonymous
 Anonymous
(@Anonymous)
Joined: 1 second ago
Posts: 0
21/03/2014 1:47 am  
"Hamal" wrote:
I consider myself as a human to be bisexual.

93

Congratulations.

"Hamal" wrote:
. Setting aside the fact that I have never met a man I want to have any sexual relations with I loathe homophobia, I find it childish and small minded.

🙂
93
Hamal

then you probably agree with my theory about Wasserman et al?

93  93/93

 


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 4053
21/03/2014 9:56 am  

Where in those verses is there the slightest suggestion that "let it fill me" implies the penis?

Assuming that a group of homophobes are promoting with fervour the works of someone who was at times a rampant homosexual, aren't there works rather more explicit and hence more demanding of revision, such as The Bagh-i-Muattar?

What an absurd "theory".


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
21/03/2014 10:53 am  

I agree with Michael, the whole thing seems very childish.

93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
William Thirteen
(@williamthirteen)
Member
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 1090
21/03/2014 6:53 pm  

we're going to have get a big blue pencil for "The World's Tragedy" as well.


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 4053
21/03/2014 8:01 pm  

Big blue pencil - 'nuff said.


ReplyQuote
Azidonis
(@azidonis)
Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 2964
21/03/2014 11:57 pm  

Apricots.


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
22/03/2014 10:04 am  

I consider myself as a human to be bisexual. Setting aside the fact that I have never met a man I want to have any sexual relations with I loathe homophobia, I find it childish and small minded.

Bisexual?

Bisexuality is a behaviour....in my view, if you don't do it then your aren't it. You can't just alter sexuality when it suits i.e. to identify more closely with AC.


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
22/03/2014 10:05 am  

The hostility from some of the posters above, indicates to me that David definitely does have a point.


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 4053
22/03/2014 10:58 am  

If I were to claim that I was a reincarnation of Aleister Crowley, and this claim evoked hostility and ridicule, would that make the claim more likely in your eyes?


ReplyQuote
Horemakhet
(@horemakhet)
Member
Joined: 17 years ago
Posts: 526
22/03/2014 12:29 pm  

Whether or not the verb is "fill" or "kill", the voice of the scripture qualifies this with "let it"- which is submissive. To suggest that there is a conspiracy amongst hetero men over the verb who are crying out: "Let it be KILLED! I will not be FILLED! I would rather *die* than have you in my ass and/or my mouth!"- is absurd.


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
22/03/2014 4:08 pm  

If I were to claim that I was a reincarnation of Aleister Crowley, and this claim evoked hostility and ridicule, would that make the claim more likely in your eyes?

Ah, not necessarily, as AC claimed to be the reincarnation of Eliphas Levi among others.


ReplyQuote
Philip Harris-Smith
(@philip-harris-smith)
Member
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 62
22/03/2014 10:12 pm  

Who cares if it was kill or fill.  Crowley was bi-sexual, who cares.  Some Thelemites are bi-sexual, some are heterosexual, some are homosexual.  As long as those who are being filled enjoy it as much as those doing the filling, who cares?


ReplyQuote
Horemakhet
(@horemakhet)
Member
Joined: 17 years ago
Posts: 526
23/03/2014 2:26 am  
"Azidonis" wrote:
Apricots.

... Peaches & Nectarines. Key in the melody  🙂


ReplyQuote
Azidonis
(@azidonis)
Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 2964
23/03/2014 2:48 am  
"Horemakhet" wrote:
"Azidonis" wrote:
Apricots.

... Peaches & Nectarines. Key in the melody  🙂

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5C8Qq2Gm4KI

Melody starts at 1:02.


ReplyQuote
obscurus
(@obscuruspaintus)
Member
Joined: 10 years ago
Posts: 315
23/03/2014 3:21 am  

I used to have an apple....but...someone ate it.!?


ReplyQuote
Azidonis
(@azidonis)
Member
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 2964
23/03/2014 3:30 am  
"obscuruspaintus" wrote:
I used to have an apple....but...someone ate it.!?

Must have been that bitch, Eve. She's been sneaking around behind people's backs, eating all of their apples.


ReplyQuote
 Anonymous
Joined: 51 years ago
Posts: 0
24/03/2014 10:36 am  

As the born-again Christian said when celebrating being cured of homosexuality

I have turned my back on sodomy, and tossed masturbation over my shoulder.

8)


ReplyQuote
jamie barter
(@jamie-barter)
Member
Joined: 8 years ago
Posts: 1688
24/03/2014 4:32 pm  

To chime in this melody with some more silliness:

♪  Yes we have no bananas, we have no bananas today ♪

(There appear to be no bananas available for filling, eating or other purposes…)

- Next?!
Norma N Joy Conquest


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
24/03/2014 6:58 pm  
"michaelclarke18" wrote:
Bisexual?

Bisexuality is a behaviour....in my view, if you don't do it then your aren't it. You can't just alter sexuality when it suits i.e. to identify more closely with AC.

No it isn't, it's a simple statement of fact. We are all a mix of male/female, it's only when people try to put other people into boxes that any confusion is created.

"michaelclarke18" wrote:
The hostility from some of the posters above, indicates to me that David definitely does have a point.

I don't see any hostility, all I see is someone with a chip on their shoulder feeling threatened.

"MichaelStaley" wrote:
If I were to claim that I was a reincarnation of Aleister Crowley, and this claim evoked hostility and ridicule, would that make the claim more likely in your eyes?

Precisely, all things being equal, there is no reason why it would.

The thing that irritates me about homophobia is that these people feel threatened by another persons sexuality. It is really is of no concern to anyone what your sexuality is. Really none of us should feel any need to define our sexuality whatsoever. There are people out there who get aroused at the sight of angular objects, certain sounds or colours without another human being even entering the equation... it's about time we stopped trying to categorise and define everyone, like it's something dangerous to be contained. Just be who you are. And if you have a problem with what or who other people are, get over yourself and realise that it's you who has the problem.

🙂
93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
25/03/2014 12:23 pm  

No it isn't, it's a simple statement of fact.

Of course it is...it's a way of behaving. I can tell myself I am a carrot, but if I don't behave like one, the chances are I'm not!


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
25/03/2014 12:33 pm  
"michaelclarke18" wrote:

No it isn't, it's a simple statement of fact.

Of course it is...it's a way of behaving. I can tell myself I am a carrot, but if I don't behave like one, the chances are I'm not!

If you want to be called a carrot that's fine by me!  😀

But carrot is a noun not a verb it, it describes what a thing is not what it does. If we were to accept your ascertain that sexual definition is dependent upon sexual behaviour we could no longer identify sexually inactive animals as male or female.

::)
93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
25/03/2014 1:48 pm  

If we were to accept your ascertain that sexual definition is dependent upon sexual behaviour we could no longer identify sexually inactive animals as male or female.

I'm talking about gender - not the sex of something.


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
25/03/2014 8:56 pm  
"michaelclarke18" wrote:
I'm talking about gender - not the sex of something.

So on that basis, to know you were for example transgender I would have to observe you doing what exactly?

😀
93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
25/03/2014 9:14 pm  

So on that basis, to know you were for example transgender I would have to observe you doing what exactly?

The transgender identity umbrella includes a number of overlapping categories, with slightly different types of behaviour. It's completely off topic, so you might wish to Google it or try Wikipedia.


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
25/03/2014 10:02 pm  
"michaelclarke18" wrote:

So on that basis, to know you were for example transgender I would have to observe you doing what exactly?

The transgender identity umbrella includes a number of overlapping categories, with slightly different types of behaviour. It's completely off topic, so you might wish to Google it or try Wikipedia.

If you are going to define a persons sexuality purely by behaviour then this is where we end up. Are we to believe that virgins and chaste priests/nuns have undefined sexualities.

But his is all an aside, what does it matter to you what another persons sexuality, sexual appetites, sex and/or gender are?

🙂
93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
26/03/2014 10:35 am  

Are we to believe that virgins and chaste priests/nuns have undefined sexualities.

'Asexual' is the word - again, look on Wikipedia.


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
26/03/2014 7:14 pm  

Anyway to summarise michaelclarke18 I fundamentally disagree that a persons sexuality

"michaelclarke18" wrote:

Are we to believe that virgins and chaste priests/nuns have undefined sexualities.

'Asexual' is the word - again, look on Wikipedia.

So let us assume you consider yourself a heterosexual because by your definition that label fits your behaviour. Then one day you have sex with a man. So on that day you become what gay? bisexual? You didn't have sex with a woman that day... so do you become homosexual that day until you later have sex with a woman at which point you either become bisexual or hetrosexual (assuming someone can commit a sexual act and then change their mind?). That's a lot of changes going on. Seems an utterly ridiculous way to carry on!

But really where I take issue with you is over it having any real importance to anyone but the person themselves and any current or potential sexual partner. I think a person becomes aware of their sexuality and therefore knows it before, if ever, they act upon it. And if you read up on some of these terms on wikipedia you will discover there are multiple interpretations and an ongoing evolution in interpretation, differing schools of thought etc.

🙂
93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
27/03/2014 9:55 am  

I am getting the distinct impression that you are determined to have the last word. All yours.


ReplyQuote
 Anonymous
Joined: 51 years ago
Posts: 0
29/03/2014 8:26 am  

How about I have the last word, and we end this entirely off topic discussion (y'know staying on topic being one of the Guidelines)!  Let's discuss something related to AC, KG, Spare, Chumbley.  Something in any of the topics actually listed on the Forums?

Geez, who really cares how anyone here defines their sexuality?  I (and surely I'm not alone here) certainly don't give a damn whatever label anyone here uses to describe their sexual preferences. That's their business, and it has fuck all to do with the topics on the Forums. 

Surely, we can come up with something much more interesting to discuss than this....

'Nuff said!


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
29/03/2014 8:36 am  

Geez, who really cares how anyone here defines their sexuality?  I (and surely I'm not alone here) certainly don't give a damn whatever label anyone here uses to describe their sexual preferences.

Perhaps people should choose not to declare it on a forum then.


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
29/03/2014 1:34 pm  
"michaelclarke18" wrote:
Interesting point David, most hetrosexual males would probably much prefer to be 'killed' rather than 'filled'.

Perhaps you should avoid making such inflammatory statements Michael! The only reason this has turned into a multi-page... well it would be too generous to call it a discussion about your apparent hangups.

So let me nip it in the bud this declaring of my own sexuality. I believe all human beings are essentially bisexual. It's a belief you no doubt would dispute, but I'm entitled to express it in response to a topic that raises the issue. And no doubt we could argue about it forever. And I for one have no interest in engaging in such a futile argument, given that it's quite clear that your mind is closed to such ideas. I therefore recommend that if you do not wish to hear my views on such matters that you cease to raise them.

I too would like to return to matters of greater relevance to this forum.

93
Hamal


ReplyQuote
michaelclarke18
(@michaelclarke18)
Member
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 1264
29/03/2014 7:22 pm  

Perhaps you should avoid making such inflammatory statements Michael!

Not inflammatory at all.....I used the word ''probably'' for a reason.

I too would like to return to matters of greater relevance to this forum.

I only wish you would.....


ReplyQuote
Hamal
(@hamal)
Member
Joined: 7 years ago
Posts: 547
29/03/2014 8:09 pm  
"michaelclarke18" wrote:

Perhaps you should avoid making such inflammatory statements Michael!

Not inflammatory at all.....I used the word ''probably'' for a reason.

I too would like to return to matters of greater relevance to this forum.

I only wish you would.....

Sigh... let's move along shall we.

93
::)
Hamal


ReplyQuote
lashtal
(@lashtal)
Owner and Editor Admin
Joined: 17 years ago
Posts: 5325
30/03/2014 12:43 pm  

Well, that was an odd thread from its outset and it never seemed to go anywhere.

Locked.

Owner and Editor
LAShTAL


ReplyQuote
Share: