“It may be a black brethren perspective.
I’m not quite sure what you’re getting at here Tiger. Are you referring to the two, um, “Ipsissimi”?!”
you know perhaps kinda a like the Yarlung red hats who take a vow to abandon or/and isolate from Shivatmadarshana in order to feed the croc’s ; what some consider as corrupted path buddhism. a cythnonicHimalayan reverberation that stirs the air initiating the ferocious winds, opening tunnels to southern shores in which the fertile earth can suck up and spit out vaporus winds.
hey
was that a gekko up there in that corner
where nothing was
there, and now
its gone must be my head .
what are those slippery patches on the floor ?
did they drive us in here and lock the door ?
oops got carried away
but my mistake,
probably not black brothers but a different system perspective.
Don Webb states the Setian System is dualistic and that Crowley’s system is nondualist due to the notion that psyche and physis are the same.
... a cythnonicHimalayan reverberation that stirs the air initiating the ferocious winds, opening tunnels to southern shores in which the fertile earth can suck up and spit out vaporus winds.
Yaa, like I said, a typhoon that thar bloweth!
hey was that a gekko up there in that corner
I thought it might have been a golem (it was prob just my imagination tho)
Crowley’s system is nondualist due to the notion that psyche and physis are the same
In the sense that there is no difference for there cometh hurt or what?
The 4th Power and the more banal & prosaic "No Comment" ruleth,
N Jyo
“Crowley’s system is non dualist due to the notion that psyche and physis are the same
In the sense that there is no difference for there cometh hurt or what?”
hmm so what are you trying to point out ? Seems like Don Webb’s interpretation of Crowley’s system is wrong or limited?
That there is dualistic division and non dualist dissolution to dandle and revamp by applying force and fire?
well as usual I guess i better go do my laundry.
hmm so what are you trying to point out ? Seems like Don Webb’s interpretation of Crowley’s system is wrong or limited?
I wasn't really trying to point anything out --- my interest in Mr Webb's interpretation of things on present showing and at the present juncture is relatively limited. My remark wasn't wholly unflippant & I think I probably just wanted to see what sort of an answer might come back again in the tide, Tiger. Like Shiva earlier I think I was momentarily at a loose end with a bit too much time on my hands & just felt like taking issue with something, in this case Mr Webb's view from the loftiest vantagbe point (i.e., Kether).
Don't get all those items muddled up in the general wash (of your laundry I mean)!
TTfn,
N Joy
Back to the Typhoonian Order anyone?
Jamie says: 'Jones’ system of cabbala was upside down and arse-about-face toward the end, though not in the good old fashioned way of ‘Kether is in Malkuth and Malkuth in Kether but after another manner’!'
Is that a sexual joke or am I just naughty?
You're just being naughty. Jones actually turned the Tree upside down, proclaimed himself an Ipsissimus, and demanded that AC (a mere Magus) take orders from him.
That's all very well, except an Ipsissimus wouldn't be issuing orders ("he has no will in any direction" - One Star in Sight).
He's not the Ipsissimus!
He's just been a very naughty boy...
И ∫ºλ
“Jones actually turned the Tree upside down, proclaimed himself an Ipsissimus, and demanded that AC (a mere Magus) take orders from him.”
well
after all
the drama of the son was enacted