Do you belong to a ...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Do you belong to a Thelemic order?


Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

I'm curious if most people here belong
to a Thelemic group/order or if most approach Thelema independently?
It would also be interesting to hear people's views on the benefits and downfalls of both approaches (belonging to a organized Thelemic group or going it alone).


Quote
Shiva
(@shiva)
Not a Rajah
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 6322
 

"The OTO is a serious and secret Order ..."

So you might not get responses from a lot of OTO members.

Many A.'.A.'. members choose to remain obscure in their affiliation. Not that there's an Oath of Secrecy, but simply because they're smart. Aside from the Family being "Public Enemy #1," the rest of society is lined up as #2.

The Path is associated with the 4 powers of the Sphinx, and #4 is "to remain Silent."

These are the numbers that indicate you might not get an accurate confession or a true response.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

Thanks for your response, I appreciate it.
Seems a bit confusing to me that
People would feel they can't respond when no one would really know who they are by the names they use here.


ReplyQuote
Shiva
(@shiva)
Not a Rajah
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 6322
 

It shouldn't be confusing, but then we are living in a world of duality.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

Crowley wanted Thelemites to greet other Thelemites and non Thelemites with the greeting
Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law. Love is the law, love under will.
This says to me that we should be expressing the law to all we meet.
So why be fearful of identifying oneself as a Thelemite on a site such as this?


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4209
 

So why be fearful of identifying oneself as a Thelemite on a site such as this?

It's not a question of being "fearful", Francis; some people prefer to work in silence and secrecy, that's all.

I've belonged to an Order since early 1976, when becoming a member of what was then known as the "Typhonian O.T.O.". It wasn't a question of deciding whether or not joining an Order was advantageous or beneficial; we don't always have rational or logical reasons for doing things. Rather, I simply felt attracted by the Order. The first two volumes of Kenneth Grant's Typhonian Trilogies had appeared; they excited and inspired me. One of my friends was already a member of the Order, and another friend knew Grant well. I've been there ever since, man and boy, and anticipate remaining in situ until the Grim Reaper comes calling.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

Thanks for the feedback Michael 😀
I understand your point and appreciate you taking the time to explain.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

93 Michael,
That's really interesting about you being involved with Thelema
From back in the 70's.
I'm always fascinated when I hear
Of Thelemites back in the day.
Things must have been so different back then before the Internet.
I'm sure searching for books must have been no easy task.
I'm really grateful to you guys for carrying the torch for those of us to come.
I should really do some reading of Grant's.
Would you recommend anything in particular?
So, I read there was some controversy with your group back in the day.
I'm pretty open minded to exploring different Thelemic perspectives.
Well, it was really good to hear from you, and maybe I'll hear from you again if you recommend something of Grant's for me to read.
93 93 /93


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

I’ve belonged to an Order since early 1976, when becoming a member of what was then known as the “Typhonian O.T.O.”. ... I’ve been there ever since, man and boy, and anticipate remaining in situ until the Grim Reaper comes calling.
"Man and boy", Michael? But I thought the Typhonian O.T.O. had a policy where they did not admit anyone under the age of eighteen? Also, if you were born in May 1951, that would not exactly make you a boy on entry but a strapping young man of around twenty five! (Actually I cannot speak for the physicality of your state, but conjecture you may have been so strapping at that time)

I’m curious if most people here belong to a Thelemic group/order or if most approach Thelema independently? It would also be interesting to hear people’s views on the benefits and downfalls of both approaches (belonging to a organized Thelemic group or going it alone)
Francis, I'm curious as to what you understand is meant by a "Thelemic group/ order" or an "organized Thelemic group". Would you perhaps care to define your terms here and how it might be possible to "organize" a collective group made up from and consisting of individual people's sovereign true wills?

Norma N Joy Conquest


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

Francis, I’m curious as to what you understand is meant by a “Thelemic group/ order” or an “organized Thelemic group”. Would you perhaps care to define your terms here and how it might be possible to “organize” a collective group made up from and consisting of individual people’s sovereign true wills?

Sorry i didn't make myself clear.
I was asking about Thelemic groups/Orders such as the O.T.O.
You know, working with or associating with a formal group as opposed to buying and reading Thelemic books and finding one's way on their own.


ReplyQuote
Shiva
(@shiva)
Not a Rajah
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 6322
 

Francis: So why be fearful of identifying oneself as a Thelemite on a site such as this?"

Fear is a pathogenic state of consciousness, associated with the Kidney (life force, sex drive, nervous system) that is not rational and is not based on reality. "Oh, what if I were to fall down and accidentally kill someone else?" "Oh, what if the government is to collapse and my dog will run away?" Fearful, suspicious, potential events are imagined, but not rooted in real events. Paranoia is the ultimate example, with Paranoid Schizophrenia being the part where they take you away. It's all illusion. Except the going away involuntarily for some medication and rest.

Fright is a pathogenic state of consciousness, associated ith the Kidney (life, sex, nerves, adrenaline), and the Heart (Consciousness), that is quite rational and is based on harsh, dangerous reality. "Oh, I have epilepsy and I'm falling down and pushing someone else over a cliff! "Oh, the government is collapsing right now and my dog is actually running away right now ... in front of a car." Fright (shock), and life-threatening events are not imagined, but are based on bad news in real events. Paranoia does not apply, because they are really after you, It's all factual and happening in real time.

Note that this site uses usernames (some use real civil names). If the CIA or the FBI or Interpol or MI5-6 or The Church of Scientology or some other agency or agent wants to find out who any Harpocrates or Aleister418-666-93 is, I believe they could do it easily enough.

Cause-and-Effect, coupled with a lengthy period of time, teaches caution, based on fright (If you push your point too strongly, the Establishment will come to get you).

"So, I read there was some controversy with your group back in the day."

I ask you to name one group, back in the day or here and now, that is Thelemic, that was not (or is not) involved in some controversy, or illegality, or torts.

It's part of the game. The adverserial relationship of the group with the Establishment is written into every OTO degree (At least in the A.'.A.'. rites the adversaries are Crocodiles and Snakes). People go through these rites, perhaps enhanced by some magical potion [probably illegal], and if the rite "takes," then the candidate finds himself or herself in a controversial situation that is eerily reminiscent of the initiation ceremony that they had undertaken.

The answer to your question will be gained by saying Do what thou wilt ... to every stranger you meet, and giving a copy of Liber AL to all your family members, friends, business associates, and strangers, wherever they are and whoever they be. Then, couple that with taking, say, the third-degree of OTO, or try the Tuat 2=9 self-initiation rite, with some legal libation. Do all that for one year, and then get back here with a report of why you might be hesitant to say anything.

Now there are exceptions. There are seasoned folks like Michael (who does book work and seems otherwise distant from the Establishment) and myself (who is retired and so far removed from society that it doesn't matter anymore) and Jamie (who has bee the Ringmaster in the Circus, and now seems to be but loosely attached to Metropolis), who have been around a long time. It is no secret that I was the Architect and Grand Secretary General <hip, hip, hooray) of what was known in the 60s as Solar Lodge OTO, a clandestine Order that was financially successful and business-like superior to almost anything else. We also were the only Order (to my knowledge) that used OTO rites, but required completion of the corresponding A.'.A.'. tasks of the grades in order to advance to the next degree.

We ran into BIG-TIME trouble with the Establishment. Not that we didn't cause it ourselves. There were premature deaths, people sat in jails for months. Traitors within the group became "witnesses" and told lies ... and then recanted those lies (on TV, no less) after they were safely away.

This cannot be avoided. Crowley wrote that everyone must pass through the circus of banging drums and clanging symbols (a loose quotation). (More on this below).

Jamie: '“Man and boy”, Michael?'

Anal-ysis: Heckling; Grammar and style nitpicking. In fact, I believe he lied about his age when he joined Typhonia, and he was just a "lad" of thirteen.

Francis: "... as opposed to buying and reading Thelemic books and finding one’s way on their own."

This is an interesting point. It is my observation and hypothesis that nobody gets set properly on their spiritual path without a mentor of some sort. Call it guru, Master, Teacher, Link, or whatever. In the written histories of various Adepts and Magisters, every one of them had a somebody (or a chain, or an Order) that helped them through the early stages. I know of no exceptions ... except one (Sai Baba, who was an Avatar and thus needed no teacher, being born "fully awake"), and one questionable (Jack Schwarz, who seemingly had no teacher, but who was born "fully awake" also). Both these fellows displayed unusual metaphysical talents as children. Man and boy.

So unless you've been birthed "fully awake," and don't lose it, then there'll be a teacher or a initiator or a guru waiting for you.

I have a student, right now, in my martial arts class, and also in the Sirius lineage. She has never had a teacher or joined a group. She learned to astral project by "stopping the internal dialog" as written in Carlos Castaneda's book(s). She has conversations with her Angel. Is this an Adept?

Well, she can astral project by "stepping out" and being whirled away to some unknown vortex, but she cannot control her flight at all. After flunking a "sample" astral projection test for Sirius 4, she had to admit that she had no control. She is 71 years old, and just realized that there was such a thing as controlled flight.

Her Angel appears as some dark threatening entity. The info and guidance seems good, but the relationship is somehow clouded.

Of course, once you make your connection at Tiphereth, you're on your own. All that stuff in One Star in Sight about Major Adepts supporting and transmitting Exempt Adept's energy is theoretical (unless applied inwardly to one's own Mars and Jupiter).

Anyone please add to this short list if they know of anybody who "attained" without the aid of a mentor in the early stages. Please identify any candidates as to whether they were born "fully awake" and never lost it (Avatars) ... or not.

Well, this has been fun, but I need to go on to the holier place.


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4209
 

I’m sure searching for books must have been no easy task.

Well, it was different. One way was to register your interest in a title with a search company. They'd often locate it for you, at a premium of course, but really not an outrageous sum. I had a friend who used to scour second-hand bookshops up and down the country. He found me a copy of the 1962 Liber Aleph for £5, and a 1936 copy of The Equinox of the Gods for £35. Though significant sums of money in those days (the early 1970s), they were probably cheaper than they are now. Bargains are rarer these days; any bookseller can check their stock via ABEBooks, Amazon, ebay etc and ascertain the going rate.

I should really do some reading of Grant’s. Would you recommend anything in particular?

I'd recommend starting with the first volume of the series, The Magical Revival, and working through the series in sequence. Grant's books are each fairly self-contained, but they grow more complex as the series progresses. My own favourites are the final trilogy of the series - Outer Gateways, Beyond the Mauve Zone, and The Ninth Arch - and I'm particularly interested in the 'received texts' therein, namely 'Wisdom of S'lba' in Outer Gateways and 'The Book of the Spider' in The Ninth Arch. Grant's is the richest, most suggestive body of work that I have yet encountered, though I realise that his work is not to everybody's taste.

By the way, my "man and boy" was unfettered flippancy. In fact in early 1976 I was, at 24, already in the throes of vigorous, swaggering manhood. In fact, I was living on a kibbutz in Israel at the time, working as a farm-labourer, and thus had biceps to die for.


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

Sorry i didn’t make myself clear. I was asking about Thelemic groups/Orders such as the O.T.O.
You know, working with or associating with a formal group as opposed to buying and reading Thelemic books and finding one’s way on their own.

I leave aside and take no cognisance of the question (and answer) of whether the O.T.O. is a "Thelemic group or Order" in the sense of being a collective of individual sovereign true wills or not, as previously mentioned. I have strong doubts as to whether the (c).O.T.O (or O.T.O International Inc.).is 'Thelemic' at all - with either a big or a little "t". I'm sure Paul won't want me revisiting all the reasons "why" here again, but if he reelly wants, I can always recapitulate them for you. You may even be able to "search" them out here, somewhere. But if anyone is thinking of joining the "O.T.O.", first and foremost I recommend they do their homework first. The relevant information certainly wasn't widely around when myself and Gerald Suster idealistically joined in the mid80s.

A.C. himself was against the idea of a group gathering together in his name, as it invariably gave rise to what in one letter he called "the usual trouble" - i.e., intrigue, backstabbing on the back stairs, all that sort of thing; in other words, internal "politicking". And there was plenty of that in the (c).O.T.O.! In fact, let me tell you ---Ahem, cough sorry about that. Where was I? Oh, yes. That was why A.C. limited the A.'. A.'. (in theory) to one's immediate superior and inferior (relativistically speaking, of course).

Note that this site uses usernames (some use real civil names). If the CIA or the FBI or Interpol or MI5-6 or The Church of Scientology or some other agency or agent wants to find out who any Harpocrates or Aleister418-666-93 is, I believe they could do it easily enough.
Quite so. Which is why I'm not particularly paranoid myself (no more than usual or necessary for anyone living in our particular first world society anyway. Que sera sera, as they say; your name is either on the bullet or it is not. Incidentally, back in the day I once had a "positively vetted" interview with a "Colonel Winchester" of MI- (actually, probably better not tell you that particular story...)

Jamie (who has bee the Ringmaster in the Circus, and now seems to be but loosely attached to Metropolis), who have been around a long time.
Too kind, sir, too kind (I think!?)

So unless you’ve been birthed “fully awake,” and don’t lose it, then there’ll be a teacher or a initiator or a guru waiting for you.
Unfortunately (?) I never had such a mentor, Shiva. I'm not sure what that makes me but I am "self taught", as the saying goes. Perhaps I need one now, even at my advanced time of life?! Would you say it is ever "too late" for us 'orphans'!?

I have a student, right now, in my martial arts class, and also in the Sirius lineage. She has never had a teacher or joined a group. She learned to astral project by “stopping the internal dialog” as written in Carlos Castaneda’s book(s). She has conversations with her Angel. Is this an Adept?
Some, acting on limited knowledge, and without knowing the full facts of the matter, might surmise she's a Schizophrenic hearing voices in her head and just awaiting those nice men in their white van to convey her to the nearest funny farm: an alternative point of view. (- but perhaps one a mite too flippant for you, mayhap?!)

Lux nox 'n' pax,
N Joy


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4209
 

A.C. himself was against the idea of a group gathering together in his name...

He doesn't seem to have discouraged Jones from operating Agape Lodge no 1 in Vancouver, nor many years later Smith and later Parsons from operating Agape Lodge no 2 in California; indeed, when it came to the latter he subsequently appointed Parsons as the Lodgemaster in place of Smith. Over in good old Blighty, he chartered Gerald Gardner to operate a 'Camp' of the O.T.O.


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

He doesn’t seem to have discouraged Jones from operating Agape Lodge; [...] he subsequently appointed Parsons as the Lodgemaster in place of Smith.
Yes, that same Agape Lodge about which Martin Starr in his The Unknown God (p.225) observed that: "in practice, Crowley treated the sole O.T.O. lodge under his direction as his personal fundraising agency". It was also actually in the direct context of Agape Lodge that Crowley made his comment; unfortunately at this short notice I am unable as yet to provide the letter with the specific reference in question (maybe someone else would kindly oblige?) However in its place I did come across instead the following, taken from a letter Crowley wrote at around the same time to his final secretary, Frederic Mellinger:

"[A] whole lot of different people keep on writing to me about one thing and the other. I have not time to deal with their non­sense and am saying so. I would rather break up the whole Group than allow things to go on as they are going. Every month or so there is some new project, or the finding of some valuable person, or the kicking of him out a fortnight later, and they expect me to waste my time on dealing with them, and their silly infantile squalling [...] I am having to dismiss all these idiots. I am going to issue an Encyclical in the next week or two forbidding them to pester me with their silly troubles” [dated 30-Oct-45]

Over in good old Blighty, he chartered Gerald Gardner to operate a ‘Camp’ of the O.T.O.
Maybe a cynic might conjecture Gardner 'crossed his palm with silver'; it usually helps, when short of moolah as A.C. invariably was during the autumn sunset of his life. (Tangentially I wonder why it was only ever a Camp, that lowliest of Order bodies intended for the reception of Minervals, which he chartered rather than a more fitting and grander 'Lodge')

'И∫ºλ


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4209
 

I haven't come across evidence that that Gardner "crossed his palm with silver", so I'll be interested to see your evidence in this matter.

The remarks to Mellinger you quote do not support your contention that "A.C. himself was against the idea of a group gathering in his name".


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

I haven’t come across evidence that that Gardner “crossed his palm with silver”, so I’ll be interested to see your evidence in this matter.
But that wasn't me; I wrote that it "maybe" referred to the action of "a cynic" who "might conjecture" blah blah. Evidence is circumstantial and to be evaluated & decided upon only by appeal to the writings, each for themself: money did change hands between the two of them for services rendered though: I cannot recall the exact circumstances and can't look it up at present so don't wish to commit myself here & now, but I am pretty sure it happened during the time they were discussing Gardner's setting up the Craft etc.

The remarks to Mellinger you quote do not support your contention that “A.C. himself was against the idea of a group gathering in his name”.
Oh? What about "I would rather break up the whole Group than allow things to go on as they are going", let alone "I am having to dismiss all these [Agape Loge member] idiots" (a threat which he never carried out --- that was eventually executed by his successor Karl Germer, in 1953). They do not speak to me strongly of any suggestion that A.C. was enamoured of the idea of their continuing to "gather" on, in his name (or rather, to be exact the name of the branch of O.T.O. which he nonetheless Headed and remained intimately identified with).

N Joy


ReplyQuote
ptoner
(@ptoner)
The plants talk to me....
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 2184
 

Member of a bunch of spliters! Damn Irish Order of Thelema! Spliters.

http://irishorderofthelema.com/introduction/history/


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4209
 

What's the problem here, Paul?


ReplyQuote
ptoner
(@ptoner)
The plants talk to me....
Joined: 15 years ago
Posts: 2184
 

Poor attempt of Monty Pytonesque humour, in order to lighten up this thread.
The Irish Order of Thelema evolved from Crowley's OTO, and draws on the native culture and powers of the land of Ireland.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

. I have strong doubts as to whether the (c).O.T.O (or O.T.O International Inc.).is ‘Thelemic’ at all – with either a big or a little “t”.
Jamie, is there anyway you can briefly state why you

    don't believe the O.T.O. to be Thelemic?

    If it's not appropriate for you to do here, maybe you can PM me as I'd be interested in hearing why you hold this feeling.


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

@ Francis :

Jamie, is there anyway you can briefly state why you don’t believe the O.T.O. to be Thelemic?
Good question. (How long have you got?! 🙂 ) Before anything else though, it is of vital importance to distinguish between the O.T.O. proper (which died out with Gemer) and the "O.T.O." in its Caliphate recension - two very different kettles of (vesica) piscis - I am therefore taking your question to refer to the latter.
To answer it as briefly as possible: yes there is (I can).

Namely: obsession with litigation at the expense of publishing and publicising Crowley - which should overwhelmingly be their primary, overriding responsiblity and duty; misuse and downright wastage of the Crowley copyrights given in their care, likewise; unnecessary and redundant secrecy-mongering, especially to do with access to and contents of the 'archive'; tinkering around with Crowley's original initiation rituals and text of the Holiest Book of Thelema; discouragement of growth beyond the "man of Earth" degrees and especially of the Ninth; Restriction upon the personal life and private affairs of members ... that is just six straight off the top of my head but the list is extensive, and goes on (like I could). However(!) ...

Have you possibly acquainted yourself much with the history involved, Francis, which may fill you in a bit more (providing you always read between the lines, of course!)? If you haven't already come across it there is always Peter Koening's extensive website on the whole subject (though one which one might find slightly labyrinthine upon first encounter) and you could do worse than to read my own resume, originally written to comprise the concluding chapters of the (soon to be released) revised second edition of (Francis King's) Secret Rituals of the O.T.O., which you could peruse here in the form of two blogs as "The O.T.O. - Its Relevance Today" and "The O.T.O. since 1973". That should hopefully help a little way towards answering your enquiry.

If it’s not appropriate for you to do here, maybe you can PM me as I’d be interested in hearing why you hold this feeling.
I don't see why it shouldn't be appropriate, as the subject is not unrelated to Aleister Crowley (which is the object of the website) and Thelema (one of its major boards), and it may be of some value to those ('newbies' for example) who haven't previously come across it before. However(!) ....

It is nevertheless the case that a vocal minority, each and everytime I express my constructive, thoughtful, truthful & accurate criticisms on the subject (and praise wherever it may be merited), has a disproportionately defensive counter-reaction to them (even when they may not be actual members themselves, as I was myself for eight years). And that, combined with the fact that other people never seem to bother to sound off about it anymore (whether ultimately due to apathy or fear of also being shot down in flames themselves), means that I no longer really trouble myself about it to any great extent beyond making the odd pertinent succinct rejoinder in a post like this. Perhaps, finally, people end up with the kind of O.T.O. which they deserve and have allowed to manifest.

Nonzealously yours (One Point of view),
N Joy


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

Thanks for taking the time to
respond to me Jamie, i do appreciate it.
May have a follow up question after giving thought to what you expressed, so i hope that's OK.

Oh, here's one; do you still consider yourself a Thelemite?


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

May have a follow up question after giving thought to what you expressed, so i hope that’s OK.
Fine by me!

Oh, here’s one; do you still consider yourself a Thelemite?
Without nitpickingly delving into definitions, there was a poll on just this question (or one very much like it, as close as makes no difference) on LAShTAL a few months ago! (What was the final verdict of it, I wonder? The last I saw of it was 70/30 in favour of the T.) Given such a straight choice between "yes" and "no", I plumped for a yes there. But the awful reality is, I do but only when I'm feeling comfortable, not "needy" & not oscillating between that and considering myself an existential nihilist (or possibly a pure Taoist?!), believing there to be no intelligent design except by accident, that there's "nobody at the wheel" and that there really is a universal factor infinite, unknown & random, as in The Despot from The Book of Lies ("But no man is strong enough to have no interest. Therefore the best king would be Pure Chance. It is Pure Chance that rules the Universe; therefore, and only therefore, life is good.")

{Or, rather mindblowingly: could they somehow even be the same a la "there is no difference between any one thing & any other" as in TBotL I:22" ?!}

--- You?

{*Thinks* Perhaps we really should be getting on back home now, Francis? (to the topic!)}
'Z ∫ºλ


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

"*Thinks* Perhaps we really should be getting on back home now, Francis? (to the topic!)}"

I agree.
Well, thanks again good to get your perspective.

So as not to continue going off topic, I'll just answer your question if i consider myself a Thelemite and get back to the topic.
Yes, I am a Thelemite 👍


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

Cushty!

N Joy


ReplyQuote
Shiva
(@shiva)
Not a Rajah
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 6322
 

Shiva wrote: So unless you’ve been birthed “fully awake,” and don’t lose it, then there’ll be a teacher or a initiator or a guru waiting for you.

Jamie responded: Unfortunately (?) I never had such a mentor, Shiva. I’m not sure what that makes me but I am “self taught”, as the saying goes. Perhaps I need one now, even at my advanced time of life?! Would you say it is ever “too late” for us ‘orphans’!?

There is nothing wrong with "self-taught." Somewhere in my quoted post, I referenced this "mentor" premise in relation to the history of someone who had "attained." I will not ask you the obvious question. There are countless self-taught, self-initiated people at all the lower seven spheres, in all kinds of fields.

Also, considering your distinguished history, you must have received the dagger from Saladin or Wazir, and taken the Oaths, etc. That would be a link with an Order, as specified in my original post as being one alternative to a guru or mentor.

Saladin sez, oyez:"... nothing will ever enable you to sever the ties which you are now about to form with us and our Order."
- King, Francis X. Secret Rituals of the OTO, First degree.

[Oh?]

I have a one-sentence instruction in how to void this bondage. But it doesn't matter here, because OTO is a Fraternal Order that espouses Thelema but has lotsa rules, regs, and hierarchy, and it is NOT a Teaching Order.

Who would disagree? Read this:

Saladin sez, nono: "I am bound to explain to you that it would have been better had you never approached us should you imagine that we can teach you the secrets of the Mysteries."
- King, Francis X. Secret Rituals of the OTO, First degree.

In this case, the OTO would probably not qualify for mentorship.


ReplyQuote
Michael Staley
(@michael-staley)
MANIO - it's all in the egg
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 4209
 

I do [consider myself to be a Thelemite] but only when I’m feeling comfortable, not “needy” & not oscillating between that and considering myself an existential nihilist (or possibly a pure Taoist?!) . . .

I was very interested to read your response to the question, Jamie. Though interested in Crowley from the mid sixties, I didn't read The Book of the Law until the early 1970s. I've had a strong interest in Eastern Mysticism as long as I can remember, and for me Thelema resonated with that through the 0=2 equation. In fact the period of Crowley's life which most interests me is the time in America during World War I, in particular the period of the Magus Initiation, the writing of Liber Aleph, the Amalantrah Working, the reworking of Legge's translation of the Tao Teh Ching, and the little that survives of the Magical Retirement of Summer 1918. I've had a growing interest in Advaita Vedanta for many years now. In my opinion this whole current (Advaita, Taoism, Ch'am Buddhism, etc) is not only compatible with Thelema, but is at its heart.


ReplyQuote
Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 6 years ago
Posts: 1825
 

[C]onsidering your distinguished history, you must have received the dagger from Saladin or Wazir, and taken the Oaths, etc. That would be a link with an Order, as specified in my original post as being one alternative to a guru or mentor.
Saladin sez, oyez:”… nothing will ever enable you to sever the ties which you are now about to form with us and our Order.”
[Oh?]

Ho! I imagine that Hassan-i-Sabbah/ the Old Man of the Mountains would have had a very similar bond to command loyalty from his Hashshashin, those original kamikaze terrorists of their day. And of course, it's vital to remember that there's the Order ... and there's "the Order".

Saladin sez, nono: “I am bound to explain to you that it would have been better had you never approached us should you imagine that we can teach you the secrets of the Mysteries.”
This is a great example of the big tease, or double bluff. Nothing gives the impression of buried treasure more than the denial of there being any such treasure buried. Ironically in this case though, it is the actual truth!

In this case, the OTO would probably not qualify for mentorship.
Yes. Or rather, No. It wouldn't.(!)

In fact the period of Crowley’s life which most interests me is the time in America during World War I,
Yes I'd agree with that too; unfortunately there are many writings and episodes lost to time there, a bit like aspects of his later 1930s period also.

In my opinion this whole current (Advaita, Taoism, Ch’am Buddhism, etc) is not only compatible with Thelema, but is at its heart.
Yes also; I recall reading your very well expressed essay on the subject with the same title.

N Joy


ReplyQuote
lashtal
(@lashtal)
Owner and Editor Admin
Joined: 18 years ago
Posts: 5349
 

there was a poll on just this question (or one very much like it, as close as makes no difference) on LAShTAL a few months ago! (What was the final verdict of it, I wonder? The last I saw of it was 70/30 in favour of the T.)

Total 'votes' cast: 154
Number self-defining as 'Thelemite': 117
Number self-defining as 'Not Thelemite': 37
Percentage self-defining as 'Thelemite': 76%
Percentage self-defining as 'Not Thelemite': 24%

Owner and Editor
LAShTAL


ReplyQuote
ignant666
(@ignant666)
Elderly American druggie
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 3715
 

The only initiatory organization with oaths and arcane rituals that I have ever been admitted to was the Boy Scouts of America. For those concerned with my "regularity", I must admit i was expelled for insolence.

Apologies to those that recall the last time i used this joke, the last time someone posted such a "Are you now or have you ever been..." thread many years back. It was a good joke then, and it still is, and needs airing out every decade or so.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

ignant666 do you feel like not having been a part of a group like the O.T.O. has hindered your studies or not?


ReplyQuote
ignant666
(@ignant666)
Elderly American druggie
Joined: 16 years ago
Posts: 3715
 

No, Francis, i do not. But then i make no claims to be an adept, or more enlightened than others, although i have been a student of AC's work for several decades.

All the "secrets" of the OTO, Golden Dawn, and AA are within the grasp of anyone able to do google searches, or find certain rare used books (i just sold one of them on ebay, so they are available). Shiva will say that the chrism of person to person transmission is essential no matter what "secrets" you learn on paper or from pdfs. I considered joining the OTO at one point, but decided against it. Were i to "join up", the AA path is distinctly more appealing, but then i probably missed my knock for this lifetime years ago.

I suppose academia counts as an initiatory organization of sorts; it certainly has arcane rituals. In fact, now that i think of it, there is a special robe and hat identifying my degree and lineage that i have to wear when i attend some of them. Maybe i need to revise my Boy Scouts joke.


ReplyQuote
Francis
(@francis1)
Member
Joined: 5 years ago
Posts: 32
Topic starter  

Thanks for your perspective on it
ignant666.


ReplyQuote
Share: