Was the HGA also th...
 
Notifications
Clear all

Was the HGA also the actual initiator in the Order in which AC started on his path as an initiate?  

Page 3 / 3
  RSS

Jamie J Barter
(@jamiejbarter)
Member
Joined: 4 years ago
Posts: 1287
27/03/2020 2:19 am  
Posted by: @shiva

I don't see anything unusual about this (1900), and I wonder what the implication might be?

Might it be because it's numerologically significant in some way (like so many others seem ta be)

N Joy


ReplyQuote
ignant666
(@ignant666)
Tangin
Joined: 14 years ago
Posts: 2378
27/03/2020 2:29 am  

I wonder if it might be useful for one of our numerous numerologists (see what i did there?) to compile and publish a list of numbers that aren't of terrific significance to Thelema/AL/The Great Work (apparently quite a brief list) ?

As a person who knows not much about numerology, by my reckoning, of the 101 integers from 0-100, 28 have some heavy Thelemic, Biblical, or other oomph, so  27.7% of my sample count as hits. Probably this just reflects my lack of numerology knowledge and there are way more.

[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 22, 23, 31, 33, 40, 44, 55, 64, 66, 69, 72, 77, 88, 99]


ReplyQuote
Shiva
(@shiva)
Member
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 4080
27/03/2020 5:12 am  
Posted by: @ignant666

The point he is making is that 1900 is before 1904.

The evidence, included in Confessions< Collected, and notes proves the 1900 - 1904 timespan. That is evident. That's why it's called "evidence."

The true point, hidden in the implication(s), to be drawn from the evidence, is what?

He had it all in 1900, and made 1904 up?

He was destined to have it all in 1900, like the pieces of a jigsaw puzzle, but it took four years to put it together?

The data presented is interesting and informative. A good job of correlation between times (years) and concepts.

What is the implication? To reveal the implication is to reveal the true point of all this data. The true point is like the true will and the true self.

 


ReplyQuote
Shiva
(@shiva)
Member
Joined: 12 years ago
Posts: 4080
27/03/2020 5:23 am  
Posted by: @ignant666

[0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 22, 23, 31, 33, 40, 44, 55, 64, 66, 69, 72, 77, 88, 99]

The easiest way to do this is to offer an Attachment. It's short, if you consider 12 pages short, but you'll get the idea with a swift perusal.

 


ReplyQuote
The HGA of a Duck
(@duck)
Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 306
27/03/2020 6:11 am  
Posted by: @ignant666

integers from 0-100

I'm not a "proper" numerologist (I don't care much for the "adding it all up" approach, usually), just a Thelemical number-nerd. Without boring you too much, my list below 100:

8: "eight, eighty etc."

11: obvious Thelemic number, number of digits in the cipher, prime factor of 418

19: number of letters of cipher (one of the prime factors of 418)

22: obvious one

28: numbers/letters of cipher, half of 56

31: obvious one

56: "six and fifty"

61: what dem Jews calls it

65: number of manuscript pages (and fascinating properties for an exciting future post 😊 )

78: those preposterous cards

80: see 8 above

93: obvious one

 

The bonus numbers (less significant):

2: prime factor of 418

9: only because of the number of "numbers" in the cipher

18: "four hundred & 18"

20: page number written on cipher page

24: the first "bracketed number" in the cipher

26: "the English Alphabet" and my base-26 nonsense

27: Liber 27 and base-27 nonsense

30: number of digits + letters of cipher

42: total page no. of cipher

66: verses of ch. 1, a mini-666

72: Shemhamphorasch

75: verses of ch. 3

76: verse no. of cipher

79: verses of ch. 2

89: the other number in the cipher

 

So you're right, about 28. The gaps between "interesting" numbers get bigger after 100, until the numbers get too big to remember. As you can see, my numbers are almost all tied to Liber AL in some way, which reflects my obsessive "hobby" of figuring out this book.

 

Posted by: @ignant666

reflects my lack of numerology knowledge

I have no numerology knowledge either, I just made up my own nonsense. 😛 


ReplyQuote
The HGA of a Duck
(@duck)
Member
Joined: 3 months ago
Posts: 306
27/03/2020 4:07 pm  
Posted by: @duck

9: only because of the number of "numbers" in the cipher

I forgot also because of "my number is nine by the fools; but with the just I am eight, and one in eight". Any other numbers found in AL that I didn't mention, small or big, go on my list.


ReplyQuote
Page 3 / 3
Share: