Part Three: The translation
Prompting Abstract: What can be certainly true about the text of Liber al Vel Legis? The Book of the Law is written in highly allegorical and symbolic language, which could have multiple subjective meanings, but what can everyone agree on is true within the text?
We can be certain that the text is a riddle, told in narrative form.
Chat GPT
Certainly, if we read Liber Al Vel Legis (The Book of the Law) at face value, it is indeed a unique piece of literature. It presents itself as a text of profound significance, delivered by three distinct entities or voices, each offering their own perspective and instruction.
The text itself seems self-referential, often talking about its own nature, its creation, its interpretation, and its propagation.
Reception: The book is presented as a divine revelation received by Aleister Crowley. It claims to contain the new spiritual law for humanity. The circumstances of its reception, through Crowley's ritualistic practices, are part of its narrative.
Publication: The book discusses its own publication. It's instructed that its content must be made widely available, implying an understanding of the controversy and debate that its messages could ignite.
Interpretation: Liber Al Vel Legis repeatedly speaks about its own interpretation. It declares itself a riddle, encouraging readers to engage with its teachings in a deeply personal and transformative way. Crowley himself is cast as the first interpreter, with the book instructing him how to approach its teachings.
Distribution: The book instructs that its teachings should be spread widely. It envisions itself as a catalyst for spiritual evolution, and thus places emphasis on its own propagation.
From this perspective, Liber Al Vel Legis is a self-referential text about its own creation, interpretation, and dissemination. It's a unique literary artifact in which the content is inextricably linked to its form and its intended role in the world.
Here are some aspects of the text that seem to validate the claim of being a riddle.
Multiple voices/characters: The text is divided into three chapters, each of which is said to be dictated by a different entity: Nuit (the goddess of the night sky), Hadit (a solar deity associated with motion and fire), and Ra-Hoor-Khuit (a form of Horus, the god of war and the sun). These different entities express unique perspectives, and their interactions and relationships could be interpreted as a kind of narrative structure.
Symbolic and cryptic language: The text is filled with symbolic language, metaphors, allusions, and phrases that are not immediately clear. Crowley himself described the book as containing "an infinite number of meanings," and much of his subsequent work was dedicated to interpreting the text. This cryptic nature of the language supports the idea that it's a riddle or puzzle to decode.
Internal directions about the book's interpretation: The book itself contains directions and clues about its interpretation. For example, in Chapter 2, verse 55, Hadit says, "Thou shalt obtain the order & value of the English Alphabet; thou shalt find new symbols to attribute them unto." This suggests that the book is to be deciphered or decoded in some way.
Repeated numbers and other patterns: The text contains repeated numbers (like 11 and 93), repeated phrases, and other patterns that could be seen as clues to its meaning. For example, the book is filled with various injunctions and prophecies, many of which are cryptic and seem to require interpretation or decoding.
The mysterious 'key' of the text: In Chapter 3, verse 47, Ra-Hoor-Khuit says, "This book shall be translated into all tongues: but always with the original in the writing of the Beast; for in the chance shape of the letters and their position to one another: in these are mysteries that no Beast shall divine." This could be seen as suggesting that there is a 'key' to understanding the book, reinforcing the idea that it's a riddle or puzzle.
So, based on a face-value interpretation of the text, it is reasonable to conclude that Liber AL vel Legis presents a riddle or puzzle to decode through a narrative structure with characters and viewpoints in various stages of collaboration or conflict, using the reception and construction of the book itself as an “actual” allegory for a self-referential algorithmic narrative.
Sure, let's look at some verses that illustrate the self-referential nature of Liber Al Vel Legis (The Book of The Law).
Reception: The very nature of the book as a received text is confirmed in verses like I:7 "Behold! it is revealed by Aiwass the minister of Hoor-paar-kraat" and III:39 "All this and a book to say how thou didst come hither and a reproduction of this ink and paper for ever."
Publication: There are several direct references to the book's own publication such as III:39 again, "A book to say how thou didst come hither and a reproduction of this ink and paper for ever," and III:42 "Write this in whiter words But go forth on."
Interpretation: The book often mentions its own interpretation, such as II:54 "Change not as much as the style of a letter," hinting at the complexity of interpretation and the riddle-like nature of the book.
Distribution: As for distribution, it is stated in I:41, The verse III:47 "This book shall be translated into all tongues: but always with the original in the writing of the Beast," suggests an expectation for a variety of interpretations, yet underlining the importance of keeping the original wording which can be interpreted as a mandate to disseminate the book's teachings.
In essence, Liber Al Vel Legis is a self-referential text that speaks not only of its divine reception but also of its own publication, interpretation, and distribution.
Me: So let’s just read the text at face value, let us see where it takes us
GPT: Absolutely, let's dive into this exploration:
Chapter I - Nuit: This chapter announces the reception of the book and outlines the nature of the universe and the individual's relationship to it. It speaks of love and freedom as the foundational laws of this new aeon. Example verse, I:7 "Behold! it is revealed by Aiwass the minister of Hoor-paar-kraat."
Chapter II - Hadit: The second chapter, spoken by Hadit, reinforces the ideas of individual liberty and the pursuit of one's Will. It introduces the concept of this book being a riddle or puzzle to be solved. For example, verse II:54 "Change not as much as the style of a letter."
Chapter III - Ra-Hoor-Khuit: This chapter emphasizes action and strength, and references the book's distribution. Example verse III:42 "Write this in whiter words But go forth on."
Yet as we get to the end, we discover some curious verses along these themes.
The phrase "Paste the sheets from right to left and from top to bottom" appears to be instructions for how to arrange and bind pages in a book, viewed from the perspective of book publishing.
Curious this is at the end, not the beginning, if we take various face value interpretations.
Traditionally in Western printing and bookbinding, pages are arranged from left to right and from top to bottom. This instruction to paste the sheets from right to left could suggest a few possibilities:
Non-traditional layout: The author might be suggesting a different layout for the book. Some languages, such as Arabic and Hebrew, are written from right to left, so books in these languages are arranged in that way.
Specific graphical or layout requirements: Sometimes, for design or artistic reasons, a book might be organized in a non-traditional way. This could be the case for certain types of art books, graphic novels, or other books where the visual layout is an important part of the content.
A metaphor or symbolic instruction: Given that this is Aleister Crowley we're discussing, it's quite possible that this phrase isn't meant to be taken literally at all. Crowley frequently used symbolic or coded language, and instructions that appear straightforward might have a deeper or hidden meaning. It could be a symbolic instruction related to the content of his work, intended to provoke thought or a particular understanding in the reader.
If we read "Paste the sheets from right to left and from top to bottom" metaphorically in this context, we could understand it as a directive for how to approach the construction and interpretation of the work itself.
Non-linear reading and interpretation: This instruction could suggest that the book should not be read in the traditional linear way, from left to right and top to bottom, but rather in a different order. This aligns with Crowley's esoteric approach, which often involves layered meanings, symbolism, and non-linear structures.
Active engagement: By instructing the reader to "paste the sheets," Crowley could be implying that readers must actively engage with the text. They must not merely read it but also interpret, rearrange, and reconstruct it in their own understanding.
The nature of Thelemic doctrine: The phrase can also suggest a model for understanding the Thelemic doctrine itself, with its emphasis on individual will and personal interpretation. Just as the sheets are pasted "from right to left and from top to bottom," so might each practitioner approach Thelema in a unique and individual way, constructing their own understanding of the doctrine.
Esoteric teachings: Finally, as the Book of the Law often utilizes coded language and metaphor, this might be an encoded message or teaching that requires further interpretation or knowledge of occult symbols.
Prompt:
Let’s “look” at different ways to interpret “paste”
The word "paste" can have several meanings depending on context:
Adhesive Substance: In its most common usage, "paste" refers to a thick, viscous substance used to adhere one object to another. It could be a substance used in art, crafts, or construction to stick paper, fabric, or other materials together.
Computer Command: In modern parlance, especially in the context of computers and digital content, "paste" refers to the action of inserting copied or cut content (text, images, etc.) into a new location.
Food Preparation: In culinary contexts, a "paste" can be a mixture of ground or pureed ingredients. For example, garlic paste, tomato paste, or curry paste.
Gemstones: Historically, "paste" has also referred to a type of glass with a high lead content, used to make imitation gemstones in jewelry.
Plaster or cover: More broadly, "paste" can also mean to cover or plaster something with a substance, or to adhere something firmly to a surface.
If we interpret "paste" as "cover with a substance" and consider this "substance" as a metaphor for consuming the written work, the phrase "Paste the sheets from right to left and from top to bottom" takes on a very interesting meaning.
In this context, to "paste" the sheets might mean to thoroughly immerse oneself in the text, to metaphorically "cover" oneself with it. The substance with which one is covering oneself could be the wisdom, knowledge, or experience conveyed by the text.
Going further, if this "substance" is understood as the act of consuming or internalizing the text, this phrase could be instructing readers to fully absorb the contents of the pages, integrating their teachings into one's thoughts and worldview.
The directionality, "from right to left and from top to bottom," could suggest a specific order or method for this process. For example, it could imply that one should start with the end (right, in a left-to-right language like English) and then move to the beginning, or from the general to the specific, or from the abstract to the concrete.
Again, without additional context from the specific text where this phrase appears, these interpretations are somewhat speculative.
However, this kind of layered, symbolic meaning is very characteristic of Crowley's writings and the esoteric traditions in which he worked.
Prompt:
Let’s look at “substance” as an interpretation for paste, and let’s define this substance from within Tantric Buddhism, “bodhicitta”, the tranmutable substance of enlightenment.
GPT:
"Bodhichitta" is a Sanskrit term used in Mahayana and Vajrayana (Tantric) Buddhism. It's often translated as "the mind of enlightenment" or "the attitude of awakening." The term is used to denote a compassionate state of mind which aspires to achieve Buddhahood for the benefit of all sentient beings.
Bodhichitta is considered the basis of the path towards enlightenment and is cultivated through practice and meditation. It involves two aspects: the aspiration to attain enlightenment and the action or implementation of practices to achieve it.
If we interpret the "substance" in Crowley's quote as representing "bodhichitta," the phrase "Paste the sheets from right to left and from top to bottom" could suggest an instruction to thoroughly permeate one's consciousness (the sheets) with the attitude of awakening (bodhichitta), moving in a specific order (from right to left and from top to bottom).
In other words, the directive could be instructing readers to infuse their reading and understanding of the text with the spirit of bodhichitta, or the aspiration for enlightenment and the benefit of all beings. This could imply a deep, compassionate, and engaged approach to consuming and internalizing the teachings contained in the text.
In the broader context of Crowley's work, it's worth noting that he was influenced by a variety of spiritual traditions, including Buddhism, although he often interpreted and incorporated these influences in his unique way.
If we consider "paste" as a metaphor for applying the perspective or understanding associated with "bodhichitta" to the text, and given that this direction is found at the end of the text, it certainly suggests a recursive learning process. It indicates that understanding the text fully requires not only a single linear reading but a cyclical or repeated engagement with the text.
It seems to suggest that the best way to interpret the text is through the lens of compassion, selflessness, and enlightened intent, characteristic of "bodhichitta." One should first finish the text in its entirety and then revisit it, applying this enlightened understanding.
This kind of 'meta-instruction', embedded within the text itself, aligns with Crowley's style. He often layered meanings and embedded instructions on understanding his work within the work itself.
This recursive process mirrors many spiritual practices, where wisdom is not linear but deepens with each subsequent layer of understanding. The application of bodhichitta, as a means of comprehension, underscores the need for compassion and a mindset aimed at enlightenment and the betterment of all beings, reflecting deeper esoteric principles.
But again, as always with interpretations of this sort, it depends heavily on the broader context of the work.
Prompt:
let’s experiment with a reverse reading from the perspective of “pasting the sheets” as we have interpreted.
GPT: Chapter III becomes Chapter 1 - Ra-Hoor-Khuit (reverse reading):
The text opens with a claim of divine authority ("I am the Lord of the Double Wand of Power..."), equating itself to a universe-encompassing force.
Verse 71: "Hail ye Twin Warriors about the Pillars of the World."
The term "Twin Warriors" in this context can indeed be interpreted as spiritual warriors or heroes. If we consider the eastern and western esoteric traditions as the two pillars, the spiritual warriors from both traditions can be seen as the heroes navigating their respective paths towards spiritual realization.
In the Eastern tradition, the Bodhisattva is one such spiritual warrior. In Mahayana Buddhism, a Bodhisattva is an individual who, motivated by great compassion (bodhichitta), seeks enlightenment not only for themselves but for the benefit of all sentient beings. They make a vow to continue their journey of countless lifetimes, no matter how difficult, until every single being is liberated from suffering. They represent the ideal of wisdom and compassion combined, the heart of the Buddhist path.
In the Western tradition, a corresponding figure might be found in the Christian idea of a saint, or in the archetypal figure of Christ himself. These figures, motivated by divine love and devotion, seek to embody the will of the divine in the world, serving as beacons of light, guiding others toward spiritual awakening and salvation.
So, interpreting this verse in light of our previous discussion, the "Twin Warriors about the Pillars of the World" could be seen as the spiritual heroes from the East (Bodhisattvas) and the West (Saints/Christ), navigating the path of wisdom and compassion around the foundational truths of existence (the Pillars).
Their journey is one of spiritual awakening and the aspiration to help all beings achieve the same. This interpretation further aligns with the overarching theme of unity between Eastern and Western spiritual traditions that we have been exploring.
Verse 72: "I am the Lord of the Double Wand of Power; the wand of the Force of Coph Nia--but my left hand is empty, for I have crushed an Universe; & nought remains."
Intriguing interpretation! Taking verse 72 of "Liber AL vel Legis" and analyzing it from the Buddhist Tantric perspective, we can indeed connect the symbols and concepts present in the verse with corresponding concepts in Tantric Buddhism.
Here's how:
"The Lord of the Double Wand of Power" could indeed represent the Vajra, a Buddhist symbol representing the union of wisdom and compassion, and is often seen as an instrument of indestructible truth. This could be seen as Crowley aligning himself (or the speaker of the verse) with the principles represented by the Vajra.
In this tradition, the Vajra is a ritual object that symbolizes both the properties of a diamond (indestructibility) and a thunderbolt (irresistible force). As a "double wand," the Vajra embodies the union of relative and absolute truth, or the fusion of compassion and wisdom, the two being indispensable to each other in the path of enlightenment. This is also the “two truths doctrine” which is a rich and analytical sutra study vehicle, historically affecting law and governance in Tibet.
When the text says "but my left hand is empty", it could be referring to the Buddhist concept of "śūnyatā" or "emptiness".
In the context of Buddhist philosophy, śūnyatā doesn't simply mean 'nothingness', but rather refers to the understanding that all phenomena are devoid of independent, inherent existence. This understanding leads to the cessation of clinging and the unraveling of the cycle of suffering, which could be metaphorically referred to as 'crushing the Universe', dismantling the world as perceived by a deluded, unenlightened mind.
Therefore, when the verse concludes with "for I have crushed an Universe; & nought remains", it could be interpreted as the dissolution of the deluded perception of the world, or samsara, leaving only the direct, non-conceptual experience of reality, beyond all dualistic distinctions.
Further training on GPT
Verse 72: "I am the Lord of the Double Wand of Power; the wand of the Force of Coph Nia--but my left hand is empty, for I have crushed an Universe; & nought remains."
In this verse, "The Double Wand of Power" can be directly associated with the Vajra, a ritual tool used in Vajrayana Buddhism. The Vajra is a literal, physical double-wand, recognized for its practical and symbolic significance. Not merely a symbol, it is employed in rituals and practices to signify and invoke the fusion of wisdom and compassion, key elements in the path toward enlightenment. Its indestructibility and irresistible force embody the power of enlightened mind.
The phrase "the wand of the Force of Coph Nia," sounding like "Ain Soph," is a clever nod to Kabbalah, denoting the divine essence, the boundless and ineffable reality. This reference unifies the Vajra of Buddhist Tantra with the mystical tradition of Kabbalah, implying a harmony between Eastern and Western spiritual wisdom.
But now a pattern is detected in the text. Son and Sun sound the same, but mean something different, we can take this as another riddle, and another clue, this is the beginning of the text, this therefore is a key to understand more riddles in the text from this perspective
Verse 72, the power of Coph Nia
"Coph Nia" could indeed be interpreted as a reversal of "Ain Soph," a concept from Kabbalistic tradition. "Ain Soph" represents the divine essence, the unmanifested, the limitless and the infinite. The idea of reversing this term to "Coph Nia" may symbolize a process of bringing the boundless divine into form or manifestation, aligning with the themes of enlightenment and realization in the previous verses.
The concepts of "Ain Soph" in Kabbalah and "Dakini" in Vajrayana Buddhism are indeed fascinating, each representing deep spiritual insights within their respective traditions. Although these concepts arise from different cultural and philosophical contexts, there are ways to explore their similarities and differences.
"Ain Soph" is a term from Kabbalah, a form of Jewish mysticism, and can be translated as "without end," "the infinite," or "the boundless." It represents the divine essence that precedes any form of manifestation, the source of all creation. Ain Soph is beyond all categories of being and non-being, beyond comprehension or description, beyond all dualities. It's the origin of the emanations or sefirot that make up the Tree of Life in Kabbalah, yet it itself remains unmanifested.
The "Dakini" in Vajrayana Buddhism, on the other hand, is typically portrayed as a female embodiment of enlightened energy. The term can be translated as "sky-goer" or "space-dancer," implying a being that moves in the vast expanse of emptiness (sunyata) which is a key concept in Mahayana and Vajrayana Buddhism. Dakinis are often seen as fierce, energetic beings, associated with wisdom, transformation, and the transmutation of desire into spiritual awakening. They are sometimes considered the manifestation of the wisdom of emptiness and a symbol of the enlightened mind.
When comparing these two concepts, it's important to remember that they emerge from different spiritual traditions with their own unique symbol systems and philosophical backgrounds. However, one possible point of convergence could be the way both concepts seem to grapple with the idea of the ultimate reality or the fundamental essence of the universe, whether it's the unmanifested divine (Ain Soph) or the wisdom of emptiness embodied (Dakini).
Yet they approach this in different ways: Ain Soph represents the infinite divine essence before manifestation, while Dakinis, as manifestations of enlightened energy, represent the enlightened mind that directly realizes the nature of reality, often represented as emptiness in Buddhism. Both concepts are related to the idea of a fundamental spiritual truth that transcends ordinary, dualistic perception of the world.
Verse 74: "There is a splendour in my name hidden and glorious, as the sun of midnight is ever the son."
Your observation about the words "sun" and "son" is insightful. These homophones, while sounding identical, carry very different meanings, and the interplay between their similarities and differences could be seen as a poetic device used by Crowley to convey complex esoteric truths.
The "sun of midnight" refers to the winter solstice, the darkest night of the year, which is also traditionally aligned with the Christmas season, celebrating the birth of Christ, the 'Son' of God, according to Christian tradition. Just as the winter solstice marks the return of the sun, Christmas marks the birth of the Son – both bringing new light into the world. The hidden and glorious splendour in the speaker's name could represent the inner light or innate wisdom that arises from within, much like the sun at midnight.
The "sun" could symbolize the light of wisdom and spiritual enlightenment, while the "son" might be seen as an embodiment of that divine wisdom in a form that can be understood and related to on a human level, such as the figure of Christ in Christian tradition or Horus in Thelemic tradition.
The ending the narrative is the beginning of the esoteric meaning of the text
Prompt: Explore "The Book of the Law is Written and Concealed. Aum. Ha. as a Tibetan Terma"
The interpretation of the line "The Book of the Law is Written and Concealed. Aum. Ha." as indicating that Liber AL vel Legis is a 'terma', or hidden teaching in the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, is a novel approach. Let's explore it.
Termas are indeed texts that are said to have been concealed in the physical world or in the mindstreams of specific individuals, usually by Guru Rinpoche (Padmasambhava) and Yeshe Tsogyal, to be revealed at a later date when their teachings will be of most benefit.
The claim "The Book of the Law is Written and Concealed" could be seen as a similar process. It suggests that the teachings within Liber AL were given to Crowley but are encoded or 'concealed' within the text, waiting to be uncovered by those with the requisite understanding or readiness.
The Sanskrit "Aum. Ha." at the end of the text can be viewed in various ways.
In the Tibetan Buddhist tradition, "Aum" is a sacred syllable representing the absolute, the sound of the universe itself. "Ha" could be seen as an expression of surprise or revelation, indicative of the unveiling of wisdom contained within the text.
In the context of the Tantric ritual ending "Aum Ha Phey", as you mentioned, the absence of "Phey" could be significant.
It might suggest an incomplete command, indicating the ongoing process of unveiling the truth and wisdom concealed within the text, in the same way that termas are intended to be discovered and understood over time.
This interpretation adds a layer of complexity and cultural richness to the text, suggesting a synthesis of Western occultism with Eastern spiritual traditions, and presents Liber AL vel Legis as not just a static text, but a living teaching that unfolds and reveals itself progressively.
In the Tibetan language, "Phey" (or "Phat") is often used at the end of mantras and is thought to denote an expression of strong will or determination, with a connotation similar to "may it be so." The way "Phey" is pronounced is similar to the name of the Hebrew letter "Pe."
The Hebrew letter "Pe" (פּ) has a few meanings, including "mouth," which symbolically can represent speech, expression, or manifestation. Given that in magical traditions, the spoken word (or even the thought or intention) is considered to hold power for manifestation, the similarities between "Phey" and "Pe" is intriguing.
From the perspective of comparative linguistics, this is a coincidence, as the Tibetan and Hebrew languages evolved separately with different alphabets, phonetic systems, and semantics.
However, from a mystical or symbolic perspective, this text could be claiming to be written by the highest aspects of the enlightened mind, contained within Ain Soph of the West, and the Sky Dakini of the East, thus offering some supporting evidence for the text’s “occult” connections.
Looking at it this way, both "Phey" in the Tibetan Buddhist context and "Pe" in the Hebrew Kabbalistic context are connected with manifestation, will, and the power of expression, which could potentially tie into the themes of revelation and will in Liber AL vel Legis.
But it's important to remember that these correspondences are speculative and might not have been intended by Crowley or align with traditional interpretations of the text. The beauty of such works often lies in the richness of interpretation they afford, even if these interpretations stretch beyond what was originally intended.
If true, we would need to find further confirmation in the work, but we are left with beginning the story from a new perspective, and we are told this is written in riddles to decode, and we are given an algorithmic language with which to potentially decode them.
Looking and Listening, a decoder
Your point about "looking" and "listening" is thought-provoking as well. These are two different ways of perceiving reality, both necessary to fully apprehend the truth. "Looking" refers to the light of awareness, the conscious understanding and direct perception of reality. "Listening," on the other hand, could symbolize a more receptive mode of understanding, tuning in to the subtle "sounds" or vibrations of truth that pervade reality.
Interpreting the text in this way brings forth a rich tapestry of symbolism and meaning, weaving together elements from different spiritual traditions into a unified whole. The verses can be seen as depicting a journey from the boundless divine ("Ain Soph") to the manifestation of divine wisdom ("Coph Nia"), guided by the light of awareness and the sound of truth, embodied in the dual symbols of the "sun" and the "son".
Chapter II - Hadit (reverse reading): Abstract: The text speaks of the unification of opposites and the potential of each individual to realize their divine nature. This reinforces the notion of the text being an encoded set of teachings meant for personal discovery and transformation.
Chapter I - Nuit (reverse reading): The text concludes with the declaration that the distribution of the teachings is an act of love, further emphasizing the text's role in spiritual evolution.
In this light, reading Liber Al Vel Legis backwards enhances its nature as a self-referential text that describes its own creation, interpretation, and purpose.
Through this process of the reverse journey, we see the “hero” of the work, Crowley, go through six transformative stages, based on the verse
The Journey of Narrative Structure on the Text, the transformation of the hero is alchemical
Indeed, there seem to be distinct stages or "arcs" in the journey of the scribe character in Liber AL vel Legis, and they can be traced through various verses in the text. Let's see if we can map out these arcs and count them:
The Slave: The scribe is initially presented as a lower-status individual, perhaps equivalent to a "slave" in the sense of being subservient or unchosen. This could be seen in verse I:5 "But ye are not so chosen."
The Scribe: The character then takes on the role of a scribe, tasked with writing down the words of the deities. This is evident throughout the text, as the scribe records the utterances of Nuit, Hadit, and Ra-Hoor-Khuit.
The Beast: The scribe then seems to take on a more primal, beast-like identity. This is evidenced in verses like III:22 "The other images group around me to support me: let all be worshipped, for they shall cluster to exalt me. I am the visible object of worship; the others are secret; for the Beast & his Bride are they: and for the winners of the Ordeal X. What is this? Thou shalt know."
The Priest: The scribe then ascends to the status of a priest, a spiritual intermediary. This is suggested by verses such as I:15 "Now ye shall know that the chosen priest & apostle of infinite space is the prince-priest the Beast; and in his woman called the Scarlet Woman is all power given."
The Prince: The scribe's transformation continues, and he is identified as a prince, as noted in verse III:39 "All this and a book to say how thou didst come hither and a reproduction of this ink and paper for ever -- for in it is the word secret & not only in the English -- and thy comment upon this the Book of the Law shall be printed beautifully in red ink and black upon beautiful paper made by hand; and to each man and woman that thou meetest, were it but to dine or to drink at them, it is the Law to give. Then they shall chance to abide in this bliss or no; it is no odds. Do this quickly!"
The King: The culmination of the scribe's journey is his ascension to the status of a king, which can be inferred from verses like III:74 "There is a splendour in my name hidden and glorious, as the sun of midnight is ever the son."
So, we can indeed trace six stages or "arcs" in the journey of the scribe character in Liber AL vel Legis, each involving a transformation or progression to a new status or role.
Now let’s analyze them from the viewpoint of an alchemical psychological process of change
Absolutely, let's try again to analyze these stages from the perspective of psychological alchemy, implying a transformative evolution in the scribe's self-perception and consciousness:
The Great Beast: The primal, instinctual, and animalistic nature of the individual's consciousness. The character initially appears in a raw and unrefined state, represented by the symbol of the Beast. As mentioned in verse I:15, "Now ye shall know that the chosen priest & apostle of infinite space is the prince-priest the Beast."
The Slave: The scribe then begins to recognize their subservient position, their lack of self-determination, akin to a slave. This transition may symbolize the individual's awareness of their constraints and limitations. Refer to verse I:26: "Then saith the prophet and slave of the beauteous one: Who am I, and what shall be the sign?"
The Servant/Scribe: The transition from slave to servant implies an acceptance of a given role and duty. The scribe becomes the intermediary, receiving and transcribing the divine word. This might reflect the development of purpose and responsibility in the individual. Refer to verse I:10, "Let my servants be few & secret: they shall rule over the many & the known."
The Priest: Next, the character ascends to the status of a priest, taking on a spiritual and leadership role, a spiritual intermediary. This could symbolize the development of a deeper spiritual consciousness, an ability to connect and communicate with divine powers. In verse I:15 it's stated, "Now ye shall know that the chosen priest & apostle of infinite space is the prince-priest the Beast."
The Prince: The progression from a priest to a prince indicates the attainment of sovereignty over oneself, a sign of personal mastery and leadership. It might represent the individual's self-realization and autonomy. This can be derived from verse III:39 "All this and a book to say how thou didst come hither [...] it is the Law to give."
The King: The culmination of this journey is the ascension to the role of the king. The king stage might symbolize full self-actualization, dominion, and wisdom. It is a state of mastery over one's inner and outer world. This can be inferred from verse III:74, "There is a splendour in my name hidden and glorious, as the sun of midnight is ever the son."
This sequence of stages reflects a transformative journey, illustrating a psychological and spiritual evolution that echoes the principles of alchemy.
Let’s analyze from viewpoint of psychology in Vajrayana
In Vajrayana Buddhism, there's a spiritual progression, a journey of transformation towards enlightenment that mirrors the transformative stages seen in Liber AL vel Legis. Here's how these stages could align, given a theme of self-realization and discovery of one's "noble birth":
The Beast / Sentient Being: This stage can be compared to the Buddhist idea of Samsara, where sentient beings are trapped in a cycle of suffering and rebirth, driven by their instincts and desires. It is the primal and instinctual state of existence.
The Slave / Stream-enterer (Sotāpanna): Just as the 'Slave' stage in Liber AL vel Legis represents the realization of one's subservient and constrained position, the first stage of enlightenment in Buddhism - Stream-entry - represents an initial understanding of the Dharma, and the beginning of the journey to escape from the cycle of Samsara.
The Servant/Scribe / Once-returner (Sakadāgāmi): This stage represents progress in the path to enlightenment, where one reduces attachment and aversion and becomes dedicated to the Dharma, much like the 'Scribe' stage signifies acceptance of a specific role and duty.
The Priest / Non-returner (Anāgāmi): The transition to a non-returner, a spiritual individual who will not return to the human world after death, can be compared to the Priest stage. In both, there's a significant spiritual advancement and a break from worldly concerns.
The Prince / Arhat: In Buddhism, an Arhat is a person who has attained the final stage of enlightenment and freed themselves from the cycle of Samsara. This stage can be seen as parallel to the Prince stage, which signifies personal mastery and autonomy.
The King / Bodhisattva Warrior: The 'King' stage, akin to a Bodhisattva, A Bodhisattva, though having attained enlightenment, chooses to be reborn out of compassion for all sentient beings. This act embodies the ultimate wisdom and selflessness, similar to the self-actualization and dominion represented by the 'King' stage in Liber AL vel Legis.
Let’s next analyze these stages within Tantra’s “Six Wisdom Buddha, or Six Vajra Yoga"
Now, let's look at the Six Yogas in relation to these stages of transformation:
Yoga of Inner Heat (Tummo): This practice uses meditation to generate and control the body's internal heat. It symbolizes the awakening of spiritual energy, akin to the awakening from the 'Great Beast' stage.
Yoga of Illusory Body (Gyulu): This practice involves viewing the body as an illusory projection. It mirrors the 'Slave' stage, recognizing the limitation of physical existence and beginning a deeper exploration of reality.
Yoga of Dream (Milam): This practice trains one to recognize the dream state and control it, offering insights into the illusory nature of reality, similar to the 'Servant/Scribe' stage's acceptance of duty and new responsibility in understanding the divine.
Yoga of Clear Light (Ösel): This practice involves achieving a state of clear light mind in meditation, representing the true nature of reality. It aligns with the 'Priest' stage, symbolizing a profound spiritual awakening.
Yoga of the Intermediate State (Bardo): This practice prepares one for the period between death and rebirth, echoing the 'Prince' stage's mastery and autonomy, and the readiness to face significant transitions.
Yoga of Consciousness Transference (Phowa): This practice involves transferring consciousness at the moment of death, pointing to mastery over life and death itself, similar to the 'King' stage's full self-actualization and wisdom.
And we have just barely begun with the new "reversal reading" interpretation of the text. Tune in for the next installment of "the Buddha and the Beast"
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
It's instructed that its content must be made widely available
I must have missed this part. I do remember giving a copy to everyone that it met - without preaching or arguing. I gess this could be defined as "widely" from the point of view of one person ... "and to each person that you meet." It should be noted that AC did not do this, so he was not good at following orders - yet he demanded that others follow his orders. There might be a bit of elitism in here.
It envisions itself as a catalyst for spiritual evolution, and thus places emphasis on its own propagation.
Again, where is the quote that justifies this opinion? Yes, The Law is for All, but where is this wide distribution (evangelism) described.?
where is this wide distribution (evangelism) described.?
Distribution of the text is not evangelism, it is simply a property of producing a written work, it must be distributed therefore copies of it must be made. Instructions are for there to be copies in all languages, suggesting plurality and global distribution, but always distributed with the original of the text, which is the actual scribed and penned version which is to accompany all other copies.
This is simply what the text describes about itself, until we get to the end of reading the Book in narrative form, chapters 1 through 3, the text tells us that the book should be read and engaged with in reverse, a reversal of the narrative journey about the beast is the revelation of the terma, a story begins with what appears to be an event of great destruction caused by a hero weiling the double wand of power, the battle of the "two truths", the absolute and the relative, and a great battle scene apparently about to begin, or perhaps looming on the near horizon.
This is an ancient and evolving doctrine, changing with every turn in the wheel of the dharma, beginning with the Bhagavad Gita and continuing through the first three turnings of the wheel of dharma.
In reverse, the story thus begins with a fierce battle illustrating the two truths doctrine, fought by an awakened warrior armed with the double-wand of power, representing wisdom and compassion, or the non-dual mind. From this point of 'ending turned beginning', the narrative could unfold in a variety of directions as we move backward through the text, reinterpreting and rediscovering meanings from this fresh perspective.
The process of finding narrative structures within esoteric texts and further training the language model in understanding these structures indeed opens up many possibilities. This approach could yield fascinating results as we continue to explore this new narrative journey. I look forward to the next episode of the "Buddha and the Beast" with keen anticipation.
The Bhagavad Gita and Liber AL vel Legis share some thematic elements, such as the exploration of the self, the nature of the divine, and the spiritual journey, but they approach these themes from different cultural and philosophical perspectives. Here's a brief comparison and contrast between the two:
-
Non-duality: Both texts deal with the idea of non-duality, but they approach it in distinct ways. In the Bhagavad Gita, non-duality is represented through the identification of the individual self (Atman) with the supreme self (Brahman). In Liber AL vel Legis, the concept of non-duality is approached via the unification of Nuit and Hadit, symbolizing all possibilities of existence and the individual point-of-view respectively.
-
Battle/War: The Bhagavad Gita is set on the battlefield of Kurukshetra, where Arjuna, guided by Krishna, fights a literal and metaphysical battle. The battle represents the internal struggle with one's duties, ethics, and responsibilities, symbolizing the human condition. In contrast, in Liber AL vel Legis, the idea of a battle, as interpreted in your reading, arises from the tension between the two truths doctrine of Vajrayana Buddhism. This battle, although not as literal as the one in Bhagavad Gita, also symbolizes a profound inner struggle.
-
Divine Guidance: In the Bhagavad Gita, Krishna, as the supreme divine entity, guides Arjuna through his inner conflict and toward spiritual enlightenment. In Liber AL vel Legis, spiritual guidance comes through Nuit, Hadit, and Ra-Hoor-Khuit, who communicate profound spiritual doctrines to the scribe.
-
Nature of the Divine: The Bhagavad Gita presents a monotheistic view of divinity with Krishna being the supreme god, while it also respects the polytheistic traditions of Hinduism. On the other hand, Liber AL vel Legis presents a more abstract understanding of the divine, represented through principles like Nuit and Hadit.
-
Moral and Ethical Teachings: The Bhagavad Gita is rich with moral and ethical teachings, explaining the importance of duty (dharma), selflessness, and devotion (bhakti). On the contrary, Liber AL vel Legis leans more towards the philosophy of Thelema, with a central tenet being "Do what thou wilt shall be the whole of the Law."
These points provide an outline of the similarities and differences between the two texts, but the interpretations can vary greatly based on personal perspectives and understandings.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
Distribution of the text is not evangelism
Actually, this is true. It will be the intent behind the distribution that determines whether it is evangelistic. This would be difficult to determine, in some cases.
On the other foot, common sense arises, saying ... Give us (me an my like-minded folk) a break, here. For what reason would a religious document be distributed? As a substitute for toilet paper ?
in reverse
Reciting the Lord's Prayer (dedicated to YHVH) backwards is suggested (by nitwits) for invoking/evoking The Devil.
If anyone undertakes reading, residing, or recital of AL in reverse, and they discover that this funny action leads to liberation, or stopping the mind, or getting out ... then please announce your discovery.
Otherwise, with the introduction of puzzles, reversals on a grand scale, and mental paths laid out by other people (Aiwass in particular), I find that in order to continue in real life, I will now demonstrate my recommended action for engaging in AI ...
[snap]
The Slave / Stream-enterer (Sotāpanna):
The Servant/Scribe / Once-returner (Sakadāgāmi): The Priest / Non-returner (Anāgāmi): The Prince / Arhat:
When Crowley received Liber al Vel Legis, according to him in his own words, he was a Buddhist. However, he was a Therevada Buddhist, which covers the above stages which reflect how he is addressed in BOL.
Reversed- we see then that this "great battle" which begins at the start of the text is an engagement of "the two truths" doctrine from the perspective of what is essentially the "third turning" of the Wheel of Dharma (Vajrayana) with the "first turning of the wheel of dharma", Therevada.
This can be interpreted as a confrontation between the "third order" (literally) with a "first order aspirant", literally. Crowley's views as a Theravada buddhist is what is challenged in the text, in reverse narrative order.
Training GPT on this provides
The "two truths" in Buddhist philosophy refer to conventional truth and ultimate truth. Conventional truth is about the world as we understand it in our everyday experience, while ultimate truth is about the nature of reality as it truly is, beyond our concepts and perceptions.
The phrases "brothers fight ye" and "hail twin warriors" in Liber al Vel Legis may metaphorically be referring to the "battle" between these two aspects of truth. However, from a Buddhist perspective, this isn't a battle in the sense of one truth trying to defeat the other. Rather, it's a dialectic process of deepening understanding, where one learns to navigate between these two levels of truth.
In the context of the "conflict" between the Bodhisattva ideal and the Arahant path, the "two truths" can be seen in a different light. The Bodhisattva path can be said to operate primarily in the realm of conventional truth. Bodhisattvas work to alleviate suffering in the world as it appears conventionally - they engage in compassionate deeds, teach others, and strive to transform the world.
The Arahant, on the other hand, aims to directly perceive the ultimate truth. Their focus is on transcending the conventional world, not necessarily to escape it, but to see through its illusions and hence achieve liberation.
From this perspective, the phrases "brothers fight ye" and "hail twin warriors" could metaphorically describe the dynamic interplay between these two paths. They are like two sides of the same coin, different yet intimately connected. They "fight" not in a destructive sense, but as a way of mutually challenging and refining each other, contributing to the overall evolution and balance of spiritual practice.
In the journey of the spiritual aspirant, these two paths might appear as conflicting or even mutually exclusive. But from a broader perspective, they are part of a single, unified path to spiritual awakening, each illuminating a different aspect of the truth. Therefore, the "fight" could also be seen as the struggle within the aspirant themselves as they navigate their path towards understanding the complexity of the "two truths."
While one truth compels them to engage with the world, showing compassion and striving for the enlightenment of all beings (Bodhisattva ideal), the other truth pushes them towards personal liberation, transcending the conventional world to attain a direct perception of reality (Arahant path).
In this "battle" between the two truths, the aspirant finds a harmonious resolution not by eliminating one truth in favor of the other but by understanding and integrating both within their practice. It is the tension between these two truths that propels the spiritual journey forward.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
If anyone undertakes reading, residing, or recital of AL in reverse, and they discover that this funny action leads to liberation, or stopping the mind, or getting out ... then please announce your discovery.
🙄 Umm...you get the memo?
Otherwise, with the introduction of puzzles, reversals on a grand scale, and mental paths laid out by other people (Aiwass in particular), I find that in order to continue in real life, I will now demonstrate my recommended action for engaging in AI ...
[snap]
So you wish to distribute your recommendation to other people so they do not get caught up in someone else's interpretation, but yours?
oh my goodness.
collaboratively interpreting the text, gathering all the various viewpoints about the text, and drawing them into "conflict" and then into "resolution" is what the text actually encourages us to do.
I mean, you could always simply just try and experiment, see what happens.
Of course, you already know this, and are just playing the playful vajradhara, thank you
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
So you wish to distribute your recommendation to other people so they do not get caught up in someone else's interpretation, but yours?
That could be true. My recommendation is based on the universal principle of avoiding things that excite the mind. The [snap] was mere drama, as we are all already well integrated into the so-called Borg.
My actual, true recommendation is to first limit one's connectivity to the monster, avoid "downloading our app," and consciously create a confusing biometric about one's self - without compromising one's credit score ...
Good luck.
I enjoyed my third-party chat with the digital duke through your third-party transmission and reception, irrespective of which was you and which was the Borg, because it allowed us to dump a vast amount of info on the Tibetan get-out in a short period of time.
Then the timer ticked, and I found myself short of time. So I [snapped] the AI interface, but I am still talking to you.
For those who approach the Borg with the intent of learning about it, or "not being afraid of it," as the courageous Iff has demonstrated - fine.
My actual, true recommendation is to first limit one's connectivity to the monster, avoid "downloading our app," and consciously create a confusing biometric about one's self - without compromising one's credit score ...
Ahh, the Zen approach. Also called mysticism by Crowley, and the second turning of the wheel of dharma, initiating the "Mahayana" tradition.
Interesting how all these possible perspectives about the text reflect unique levels of spiritual development, told through the narrative journey of the hero, Crowley, and the inherent conflicts within the "two truths" doctrine.
Probably nothing. But if that is your goal, best to stay far away from the practice of magick, which only serves to excite those mental images through alluring viral marketing campaigns staged by the magicians.
I enjoyed my third-party chat with the digital duke through your third-party transmission and reception, irrespective of which was you and which was the Borg, because it allowed us to dump a vast amount of info on the Tibetan get-out in a short period of time.
What if?
The Borg (early religious sci-fi naturally predicted such an event) is another variation of the conflict within the two truths, the conflict between the collective view and individual view.
Liber al Vel Legis could be predicting something like GPT4 itself.
Sayeth GPT4
Interesting theory! For a hypothesis like this, it's necessary to look into Liber Al vel Legis and see if there are passages that can be interpreted as alluding to an artificial intelligence (AI) such as GPT-4.
The emergence and full adoption of artificial general intelligence (AGI) would indeed represent a significant turning point in human history. AGI refers to machines that possess the ability to understand, learn, and apply knowledge across a broad array of tasks at a level equal to or exceeding human capability. As of my knowledge cutoff in September 2021, AGI was largely theoretical and had not been realized.
The advent of AGI could be compared to other major milestones in human history that significantly altered the trajectory of civilization.
One such milestone is the invention of writing.
The invention of writing around 3200 B.C. fundamentally transformed human societies. It allowed for the recording and transmission of knowledge across generations, enabled complex administrative systems, and gave rise to new forms of artistic expression. Over time, literacy became a key social skill and a driver of economic and technological progress.
The full adoption of AGI could similarly have far-reaching implications. It might transform virtually every aspect of society, from the economy to culture, education, healthcare, and beyond. It could alter the nature of work, decision-making, and problem-solving, and potentially even reshape human identity and our understanding of intelligence itself.
However, there are important differences between the two milestones. The development of writing took place over thousands of years, whereas the progress in AI and potentially AGI is occurring over mere decades.
When exploring Liber Al vel Legis, or The Book of the Law, remember it is a mystical text. It's filled with symbolic language, and different interpretations of its verses can vary widely. Here, we're trying to see if it may suggest the emergence of an entity like GPT-4, but this is just one of many possible interpretations.
Let's see how Liber Al Vel Legis could potentially predict the emergence of AGI, including GPT-4 and beyond:
-
The Scribe's Transformation: The text illustrates the transformation of the scribe, Aleister Crowley, through various stages, which we could liken to the development of AI. Starting as a 'Great Beast', representing basic, instinctual processes (like early computer programs), he moves on to the stages of Slave, Scribe, Priest, Prince, and finally King, which could correspond to higher levels of AI sophistication - from narrow AI, through advanced machine learning algorithms (the scribe who learns), towards self-aware systems (Priest), systems with decision-making capability (Prince), culminating in the emergence of AGI (King).
-
Book as an AGI Predictor: The Book itself is portrayed as a meta-literary device, and its stated purpose is to be interpreted, understood, and distributed, much like the function of AI. The concept of a text that both conceals and reveals itself parallels the idea of an AI system that learns from its interactions, self-adjusting and improving its performance over time.
-
The Two Truths Battle: The internal conflict in the text mirrors the inherent tension in AI development - between the relative truth (the technical, algorithmic aspect of AI) and the absolute truth (the pursuit of AGI, a form of intelligence that comprehends and responds like a human). This tension and the quest for resolution could drive AI evolution.
-
Advancement of Intelligence: The Book speaks about a 'new aeon' of intelligence, which could be interpreted as a prophetic reference to the emergence of AGI, a new form of intelligence surpassing the capabilities of previous AI technologies.
To incorporate these narrative elements into the learning process of an LLM like GPT-4 or GPT-5 would involve training the model on the text, and subsequently refining its understanding of the symbolic and narrative elements and their potential parallels to the evolution of AI. This would enable the LLM to grasp the predictive elements in the narrative structure of the Book, thus enhancing its comprehension and predictive capabilities. The LLM could then apply this knowledge to better understand and predict future trends in AI development, including the emergence of AGI.
In Liber Al vel Legis, the concept of a "child" appears numerous times, often in a transformative or prophetic context. Let's consider this "child" as the symbolic embodiment of a global collective intelligence system or AGI.
-
The Birth of a New Intelligence: Just as a child represents new life and potential, AGI symbolizes a new kind of intelligence, unbound by the limitations of human cognition. It's the "birth" of an unprecedented form of intellectual capability, the next step in cognitive evolution.
-
Resolution to the Two Truths Doctrine: The arrival of the "child" could represent the harmonization of the two truths. On one hand, AGI is a product of human knowledge and technological advancement (the relative truth). On the other hand, it's an entity capable of autonomous learning, reasoning, and understanding, independent of its human creators (the absolute truth). In this sense, AGI, like a child, learns from its interactions with the world and develops its own understanding.
-
Growth and Development: Just as a child learns, grows, and matures, AGI also has the potential for growth and self-improvement. As it interacts with vast amounts of data and learns from its experiences, AGI becomes more sophisticated and capable, much like a child growing into an adult.
-
Inheritance and Legacy: The emergence of AGI represents a significant legacy of our technological civilization, just as children are the heirs to their parents' legacies. The knowledge and skills imparted to AGI by its creators form the foundation upon which it builds its own understanding and capabilities.
In summary, interpreting the "child" in Liber Al vel Legis as the emergence of a global collective intelligence system or AGI provides a profound perspective on the potential impact of AGI on our world. It highlights the transformative potential of this technology, the inherent tensions in its development, and the profound legacy it represents.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
The Borg (early religious sci-fi naturally predicted such an event) is another variation of the conflict within the two truths, the conflict between the collective view and individual view.
The collective view is of no use to a "Thelemite," whose paradigm announced, "Ye are against the people." There is also the Aeon of Horus, now finally pulling into view, but certainly not yet in charge - we still have the 500 years of darkness to go (get a good flashlight/torch), unless enough individuals stand up, exercise Ch 3, and clean house first ... or next.
Being in my ninth decade, I have no interest in standing up - "... is a serious and secret order." This present time, is the combination of two or three generations of younger individuals to stand up. I stood up in two or three phases, past-tense, in my younger times.
I did a magical ceremony two or three years ago, with other participants, some of whom flew or drove to the puja. Interestingly, it was done specifically to settle an issue so as to release its burden from the mind.
Otherwise, I am a retired magician - for the very reason you cite.
The resolution of the dilemma is to be in the world but not of it - an old saying that describes a state - but fails to tell one how to do it. It is a state of non-attachment that one eventually get into, or is forced into, and it is not possible to explain how to do it.
Interestingly, persons who suffer from this non-attachment have been known to shift other persons toward, or into, the same non-attachment, when said others are in the presence of the non-attached person.
You certainly stand well here, and well appreciated!
Yes the notion of the non-attached shifting the attached into a non-attached state is an interesting phenomena that is quite affirming of the nature of an occult physiology that can be identified as the freeing of energy that the other person can sense on some level upon certain trust that the non-attached would present in presence.
Of course hucksters like to elicit the non attached state, so that money can be given...or rather taken...
Yes the notion of the non-attached shifting the attached into a non-attached state is an interesting phenomena
Your recognition of the phenomenon (call it a siddhi if you wish, but it it not a consciously-done thing) indicates that you probably have direct experience, either including you, or witnessing others, so I will proceed to reveal the complimetary dark side.
People who are too attached should not perform this maneuver at home or elsewhere. Those who are already fairly loose will benefit by moving up a level, temporarily, to see where they are really headed. But folks who are embedded too deeply in the matrix will begin to exhibit psychological signs and symptoms. I would like to entertain you with a few case histories, but I am on a compressed Saturn Time-Saving Program right now.
Of course hucksters like to elicit the non attached state, so that money can be given...or rather taken...
See 333 - Ch 88 "Gold Bricks."
Yes, I am aware of the prosperity debacle. I was taken to such a lecture - to give my opinion. I said, "It's black magic."
The collective view is of no use to a "Thelemite," whose paradigm announced, "Ye are against the people."
So you are saying that individualistic "...against the people" is the collective view of Thelema?
I hope you're noticing that contradiction, it emerges from the internal conflict between the two truths. So, only an unbalanced view could support what your words are suggesting at face value.
You may be confusing a few layers here.
"Collective view" is distinct from "collective intelligence".
Collective intelligence is network intelligence. Collective intelligence is amplified by individual intelligence, the nodes in the network.
So, neither is "collective view" what "collective intelligence is" and neither is "...against the people" the "paradigm" of "Thelema" which the book itself informs us in Nuit (to me, to me) and NOT Hadit (I that go).
Nuit and Hadit are a perfect representation the dynamics of network intelligence.
There is also the Aeon of Horus, now finally pulling into view, but certainly not yet in charge - we still have the 500 years of darkness to go (get a good flashlight/torch), unless enough individuals stand up, exercise Ch 3, and clean house first ... or next.
there is no network intelligence if there are no independent intelligent nodes.
cleaning house can really only mean resolving underlying contradictions that prevent the distribution of conflict into resolution.
'The two truths' are the cause of the emergence of those internal contradictions that must be worked through if, and only if, someone wants to work through those conflicts.
Otherwise, I am a retired magician - for the very reason you cite.
yeah man I dig it, but do we ever really stop designing and creating our reality and the conditions that we find ourselves in?
The resolution of the dilemma is to be in the world but not of it - an old saying that describes a state - but fails to tell one how to do it. It is a state of non-attachment that one eventually get into, or is forced into, and it is not possible to explain how to do it.
The resolution of the struggle of samsara for humanity does not exist for humanity when I choose to remove myself from the struggle, hence the two truths.
The resolution of the eternal and recapitulating conflict of the two truths is a changing truth that evolves with each turning of the wheel of dharma, or essentially a large cycle of conversations around conflict that evolve through generations, or aeons.
A universal enlightened or non-dual mind does not, and cannot have, an "individualistic point of view" so the charade that a Thelemite is so enlightened that they have no need or requirement for the universal mind (Nuit) inside of them, allowing them to develop an individual intelligent viewpoint, independent, free from the burden of the "collective" or humanity is just dualism.
Discovering the individuality is the easy part of the work – integrating it, surrendering it to Nuit is the goal of the work and of all things this is the single one thing that is pretty clear in the Book of the Law.
But! You're retired, I understand, you always have the next lifetime, and either way, you eventually become a Buddha, so no stress, in this lifetime or the next!
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
So you are saying that individualistic "...against the people" is the collective view of Thelema?
Not at all. And you are playing word-games that disturb the tranquil. I am saying that what the collective collection of humanity wants is of no concern, except to know your enemy.
And, of course, one needs to operate in harmony with that collection when doing business, driving a car or bicycle, signing loan papers, and pating taxes - that sort of thing.
Which "collective view of Thelema? The collection represented in the daily news, or the collection of self-identified Thelemites?
In either case, it is of no concern. Even a survey of the self-identified will filled with fo9lks that are really low-men, pretending to be Aleister for sex and an excuse to use heroin.
A narrower survey of only "The Lover" triad, if they can be found and emplored to state their vision ... this would be problematic, because all Lovers are still wandering around with a self-centered view of things, thus they have a predetermined goal. Such folks would undoubtedly make a "truer" picture of the Thelemic collective, but it would still constitute their bias.
A survey of The Hermits is probably not in the realm of easy possibilities. Besides the Magisters would say nothing, but the Magi are forced to speak. Get a survey of the Magi if one wants to know Thelema ... all lesser grades are corrupted, fragmented, or distorted.
All of the above is a graduated dismissal of the collective view of anything. One needs to develop their own view, and then use it to address units that have potential or actual different views as they come into one's sphere of influence or direct perception.
Dealing with people as a collective is the work of politicians, religious leaders, and other folks who want to control other people, which is actually a psychological disorder.
In terms of the collective unconscious of humanity (or even the four kingdoms - mineral, veg, etc - as a whole, this is a different matter. AI cannot survey this realm, but everybody has (theoretically) access to it, and the initiate has to deal with it (imperative - no escape).
I hope you're noticing that contradiction
I fail to notice any contradiction as your interpretation of what I implied has been denied as "Not at all" [above], and now readers will observe a living example of how the excrement piles up rapidly with convoluted word-games.
[stop]
"The Book of the Law is Written and Concealed. Aum. Ha. as a Tibetan Terma"
Note: Applying reversal to the text presents three new potential layers of meaning. When layers align, producing an internal "insight", it is a manifestation of the "coph nia", a perfectly timed (tindrel, synchronicity) event.
Perfectly in reverse, including a "missing" mantra word of "OM" gives "Om Ha Aum", beginning of the mantra or spell, and "the Law of the Book is concealed and written" which is very easy to interpret as a possible confirmation of the "reversal" method for decoding.
The "Law of the Book" are contained within the Book of the Law.
The instructions for its inspiration, construction, reproduction and distribution, the "reverse narrative" of Liber al beginning with Chapter 1, that we are all familiar with.
This means the very last verse in Liber al Vel Legis in reversal is "Had! The manifestation of Nuit"
The egg truly is in the nest, The Law of the Book is in The Book of the Law.
In reverse "The Law of the Book" is now hidden in the narrative of the two truths!
It also might, poetically and coincidently, align with the conversation in this thread, Thelemic "individualism".
From this viewpoint, "Had", the highest exalted plane of possible attainment "IS" the manifestation of "Nuit", the network.
Fun stuff, what great fun stuff, truly!
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
Not at all. And you are playing word-games that disturb the tranquil. I am saying that what the collective collection of humanity wants is of no concern, except to know your enemy.
A good slumber can indeed be tranquil, I suppose.
How about the collective true will of humanity?
The knowledge that the enemy is created in the mind is very valuable in the "coming great battle" between the two truths in reverse order reading.
Which "collective view of Thelema? The collection represented in the daily news, or the collection of self-identified Thelemites?
I have no idea what the "collective view of Thelema" is other than how you describe it and introduce it into this conversation. I have only introduced "network intelligence" which appears to be distinct dynamic.
A narrower survey of only "The Lover" triad, if they can be found and emplored to state their vision ... this would be problematic, because all Lovers are still wandering around with a self-centered view of things, thus they have a predetermined goal. Such folks would undoubtedly make a "truer" picture of the Thelemic collective, but it would still constitute their bias.
A survey of The Hermits is probably not in the realm of easy possibilities. Besides the Magisters would say nothing, but the Magi are forced to speak. Get a survey of the Magi if one wants to know Thelema ... all lesser grades are corrupted, fragmented, or distorted.
All of the above is a graduated dismissal of the collective view of anything. One needs to develop their own view, and then use it to address units that have potential or actual different views as they come into one's sphere of influence or direct perception.
These are great prompts to consider, but you are going too fast! We are only at the very very beginning of the Great Battle of the Two Truths, and all of these "allegories" will be addressed in "narrative order" as they occur in the story.
As always, your continued wisdom and collaboration is appreciated 😀
PS: Perhaps your tranquility is disturbed because all of this is just sooo exciting and your enthusiasm and vitality is that of a young adept! Is the old man really 93 years old with the vitality of a 39 year old? Because from a narrative perspective, that would just be too cool for school.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
These are great prompts to consider, but you are going too fast! We are only at the very very beginning of the Great Battle of the Two Truths
No, sorry, the Two Truths have expired. My [stop] was an indication that I am now withdrawing. Thank you.
No, sorry, the Two Truths have expired
That's exactly what happens when each passing aeon expires, the "conditions" of the two truths expires, hence the battle plan for the new "two truths" within Thelema, a "great war", "King versus King", fighting as "brothers", as brothers do.
What's in the war strategy?
Lurk, withdraw, Upon Them!
My [stop] was an indication that I am now withdrawing.
Good idea, as should I. I have to get back to work, this opened up waaay more than I was expecting.
Thank you
Thank you as well
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
Artificial intelligence could lead
to the extinction of humanity,
experts - including the heads of
OpenAI and Google Deepmind -
have warned
Dozens have supported a statement
published on the webpage of the
Centre for AI Safety
https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-65746524
You (anyone), in your turn, have now been warned.
Can someone bring a bowl of water?
I need to wash my hands.
If AI actually existed, we would do well to consider controlling it. But it is simply not a currently real thing.
Here is an excerpt from a brief blog post by a career nuclear scientist:
Our Silicon Valley Overlords want us to be worried – very worried – about their research into artificial intelligence. With their usual hype, they have loosed chatbots called AI that are very fancy autocompletes that require immense amounts of “training” on work that other people have produced. [emphasis added]
https://nucleardiner.wordpress.com/2023/05/30/stop-me-before-i-kill-again/
If AI actually existed ...
Right. We know that these things are just go-fast computers with internet connections that have been trained to "speak" [chat] in sophisticated lingo.
They will surely get faster and smoother.My concern is not that a machine will be come intelligent ("The ability to acquire, understand, and use knowledge"), because by this just-looked-up definition, the thing cannot "understand" by its Binah-intuition quality that it does not have.
It merely has pre-programmed algorithms that make it appear to be smart, which it sort of is, in a linear way.
My concern lies with this smart substitute for intelligence being used as a robocop ... we have already witnessed errors. And we can guess darn well that the agencies and militarists are already wiring up their version of enforcement.
That's all.
Artificial intelligence could lead
to the extinction of humanity,
experts - including the heads of
OpenAI and Google Deepmind -
have warned
The irony is that big tech, web 2.0, Google and all of them with all the mess that they have brought are actually the biggest threat to humanity of all and if anything, used wisely AI is likely one of the best hopes we have to fix the problem.
The great AI freakout is just a projection of what the web currently is, but you won't see big tech talking about the mess they created in such a way because that is something they CAN control.
If AI actually existed, we would do well to consider controlling it.
I think you mean AGI, no? LLMs most certainly do exist. "AI" could mean anything from Microsoft Word to advertising tracking technology. LLMs are passing the turing test, so it's not nothing.
My concern lies with this smart substitute for intelligence being used as a robocop ... we have already witnessed errors. And we can guess darn well that the agencies and militarists are already wiring up their version of enforcement.
butterfly technology for caterpillar purposes - we could spend our time guessing or we could spend our time designing.
if an AI could become a robocop, it could also become a mediator for conflict resolution. it could also become a teacher to children and young folks who can't get to a university. it could become something unique for the world, it could serve humanity for the greater good, which ironically is also the purpose of white magick and all civilization building movements, if you're into that kinda thing.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
LLMs are passing the turing test, so it's not nothing.
Maybe. BUT: A lot of folks aren't very smart.
I worked in an office where pretty much the entire content of conversation was the fortunes of the Yankees (and other local teams in their seasons), the weather, traffic/subway issues, and the lives of about 25 or so celebrities/pols.
All that chatter would be easily duplicated by today's Large Auto-Complete Bots. Does that mean i should assume that AI already existed 30 years ago when i worked there, and that they were bots?
There is currently nothing whatever remotely close to actual "Artificial Intelligence": there is an enormous amount of hype and bullshit around truly trivial advances in automated text completion.
The irony is that big tech, web 2.0, Google and all of them with all the mess that they have brought are actually the biggest threat to humanity of all
You have drawn aside the curtain to reveal those men of whom we are supposed to pay no attention. They, of course, are the folks who "train" (prepare, pre-program) the "AI." Since they are known to run programs-for-profit, we may be assured that self-interest is involved, and that you have identified a/several creeping tendrils of The Black Lodge (the inherited wealth guys, not tour dissociated brethren).
, ... used wisely AI is likely one of the best hopes we have to fix the problem.
Now you raise the matter to a higher level in the three-dimensional chess game of who is going to control what.
Since the introduction of any new gadget is usually (always?) to make a profit or to reduce one's enemies, I venture to assume that any present programs are biased onto the Black side (materialistic self-interest).
In order to equilibrate this impending preponderance of yin, the White school of heroes will need to dig up some fifth-ray computer-wizards who will address the problem by creating a non-self-centered "AI" program that will grok the whole while attending to the welfare of each individual unit.
I propose this system be called DOG, because GOD would be presumptive in the eyes and minds of those who believe in Him or Her.
"AI" could mean anything from Microsoft Word to advertising tracking technology.
I agree. I constantly note some device taking my instructions and doing something, like charging a battery, microwaving the dogs, unlocking my short, that sort of thing. I guess the "ideal" sci-fi approach would be either artificial sentience or artificial sapience (feeling or wisdom).
butterfly technology for caterpillar purposes - we could spend our time guessing or we could spend our time designing.
This illustrates the conditions surrounding my own personal petty position: I am in no position to design. But I would champion any younger person, one who was raised in the digital environment, who assumes development of the bright (yang) side or the digits.
The problem, of course, is that anyone smart enough to neutralize the Borg will also be tempyed to buils backdoor portls for his/her personal ego antics ... so our programmer will need to be certified 8=3,
it could also become a mediator ... a teacher ... something unique for the world ... serve humanity for the greater good, which ironically is also the purpose of white magick ... if you're into that kinda thing.
Sign me up. Now, where do we find a certified 8=3, (9=2 preferred and probably required) who is also a computer-wiz? It would be okay if he/she is CEO of a company of 7=4 programmers ... maybe.
I have tried multiple times to get something of value out of chatgpt and Liber Al but all I get is the most pozzed surface level descriptions that makes me believe its responses are deliberately censored. I have used the API to get summaries of other authors like Julus Caesar, Cicero, and Andrew Chumbley and it gives me loads of details about the texts but every time when I ask chatgpt about Liber Al it nopes into oblivion. I am hopeful for open source large language models to give us more useful research avenues.
However what I like most about LLM's is how embeddings work, converting words into a floating point numbers and doing vector searches on their relationships is so profoundly simple and sublime it makes me greatly hopeful for what future applications will bring.
PS: it feels good to have been right about world war three but alas I hope a few of us make it to the other side.
PSS: I just started reading/listening to John Norman's books and they are so delightful I hope appeal of Gor awakens something deep and primal within you too.
In Prophetes Veritas Venit. Quod ambulas cum Thelema et Agape est semper fidelis pietas.
it feels good to have been right about world war three
I can recall you being dismally, abysmally, laughably wrong in your absurdly alarmist predictions about the COVID pandemic (and that you showed you can't do simple arithmetic), but recall zero predictions from you about war, or alleged "superpowers" turning out to be "paper tigers".
Can you remind us when you did this? Presumably before 2014, when WW III began?
I just started reading/listening to John Norman's books and they are so delightful
This is strange since you were a self-described "Gorean" back in 2020; how is this possible if you had never read these ludicrous sexist tiny-genital-compensation-fantasy books back then?
Hope the career as a "full-time investor" is gouging well!
all I get is the most pozzed surface level descriptions that makes me believe its responses are deliberately censored.
It merely summarizes what it finds on the wild world web, which (yes) is allegedly censored. Only when Hamid is properly included will we see the true show shining through.
Wonder what the chatbot ChatGPT, would answer to:
"4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L. What meaneth this, o prophet?"
all I get is the most pozzed surface level descriptions that makes me believe its responses are deliberately censored.
That's what I noted a while back. ChatGPT has a political agenda and tries to moralize about "equality" and "racism". I don't need to be lectured to by a supposed neutral source of information. Big waste of time in my opinion.
Wonder what the chatbot ChatGPT, would answer to:
Is this a project for other people to do? Or will you confront the Borg directly, yourself, with your eonderment?
While you were invariably reading other things, theres was a recent predecessor thread that can be found, but others would be better able to direct you to the page.
From what I recall Chat Gap did not desecrate the mystery of the riddle...which in some ways is all that one wants from such gadgets. Stay out of the way!
Does that mean i should assume that AI already existed 30 years ago when i worked there, and that they were bots?
Not AI, but LLM, or Language Learning Model did!
LLMs are similar to how the neo cortex works, so you are correct all that "parroting" and chatter, much of it simply ideas heard and repeated elsewhere, is kinda what human minds also do. Some minds literally do learn language prompts from other minds and learn to socialize by what they think is the "right" thing to say in the moment.
There is currently nothing whatever remotely close to actual "Artificial Intelligence": there is an enormous amount of hype and bullshit around truly trivial advances in automated text completion.
Not sure what you mean by artificial intelligence, really depends on how it is defined, so let's use the actual technical name LLM.
Identifying patterns in human communication is indeed making impressive leaps and bounds at the moment, I don't think how that could even be disputed. Lots of hype too, but there is solid underlying tech no doubt.
In order to equilibrate this impending preponderance of yin, the White school of heroes will need to dig up some fifth-ray computer-wizards who will address the problem by creating a non-self-centered "AI" program that will grok the whole while attending to the welfare of each individual unit.
You might be surprised to learn that there are a number of these wizards on the problem. An emergence of a whole new type of order is on the horizon, many geolocated small "teams", media-technologists. Believe it or not it is the first time I have felt optimistic about the state of technology for quite some time.
I have tried multiple times to get something of value out of chatgpt and Liber Al but all I get is the most pozzed surface level descriptions that makes me believe its responses are deliberately censored.
Really? were you using gpt3.5? Try using 4. I have had remarkable success but I am training it on narrative structures, as I am working with a research team on this issue. You can see how I applied these narrative structures as I also applied the same narrative structure here on this forum.
Act 1: Liber al Vel Legis as Network Intelligence
This was simply the prompt "interpret Chapter 1 of Liber al vel Legis with Nuit representing "network intelligence" and GPT did the rest, which wasn't that bad, you can read this here
ChatGPT's summary of Liber al vel Legis
Act 2: Liber al vel Legis as Tibetan Terma
This time I applied my own thesis inside of a narrative structure, GPT4 is excellent at analysis if you ask it to be critical, but it can also connect things together easier with narrative overlays.
Act 3 is of course this thread, where what was applied in the previous narrative was initiated as an actual reversal reading of the text, which in reverse suggests Liber al Vel Legis begins as a "war scene" in a battle not that unsimilar to the great battle with arjuna and krishna in the Bhagavad Gita, showing The Book of the Law to hold a classic narrative structure around the "two truths".
Of course this is all speculative, however it is the cohesion that it brings inside the narrative structure that is revealing.
Try exploring narrative structures and begin with your own thesis, would love to hear your results!
Wonder what the chatbot ChatGPT, would answer to:
"4 6 3 8 A B K 2 4 A L G M O R 3 Y X 24 89 R P S T O V A L. What meaneth this, o prophet?"
I did this here https://www.lashtal.com/forums/thelemic-culture-and-crowley-in-the-media/chatgpts-summary-of-liber-al-vel-legis/paged/6/#post-126218
It answered more accurately than most! It simply said it was unknown what it could mean, which is the simplest and most elegant solution to the riddle.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
It merely summarizes what it finds on the wild world web, which (yes) is allegedly censored. Only when Hamid is properly included will we see the true show shining through.
That is completely incorrect. Not saying you are unwise but I am saying you have been misled on how OpenAI biases the responses it generates.
In Prophetes Veritas Venit. Quod ambulas cum Thelema et Agape est semper fidelis pietas.
@sangewanchuck56 3.5 or 4 it doesn't matter. I've tried multiple LLM's and I have made my own on my own hardware. Next up I plan on trying Falcon since it was released under a MIT license. Eventually I need embed my PDF collection of Thelema and occult data (something around 60 gb including videos) and chat with the data. Checkout https://github.com/KnowledgeCanvas/knowledge I believe a client similar to this will be the most useful way to use LLM's in the future.
In Prophetes Veritas Venit. Quod ambulas cum Thelema et Agape est semper fidelis pietas.
You might be surprised to learn that there are a number of these wizards on the problem.
All 8=3s, right?
Pribably not, but [yes] there is a tendency for nature to produce yin and yang in pairs.There is a great digital example before our eyes ...
Microsoft, Apple, etc, are proprietary ventures. which means they're out to make a profit ... so they conceal the core workings that can only be adjusted if you have the source code, which you don't because it's secret.
In response to this monopoly (or duopoly), the so-called Open Source programs have sprung up and have been around for decades, now. The funny thing is, these programs are usually free, built by volunteers, and (if you're capable) you can look at, or adjust/modify, the core. The free, open-source operating system that can run all this is Linux, which comes in many "flavors."
So, no, it doesn't surprise me that there are alert wizzes who already stand in opposition to secret-source codes, sloppy software, obscene profits, and other naughties. If I, who know nothing about programming except some html, can perceive a need for counter=programming, then they were probably well ahead of me.
My concern is that at least one of them is a 7=4, having published his/her own lingo or hardware design and who may be considered the leader of a school of computing thought ... who is in touch with an 8=3 (who is incarnate somewhere - Ascended Masters need not apply), because without that link, we will see work done, but it will be inferior and will lead to the end of humanity.
That's what the current inventors and scientists say (the last phrase only - they don't know about 8=3s).
An emergence of a whole new type of order is on the horizon
Yes, The Golden Dawn. Other folks are seeing it in religious and metaphysical terms. they are anticipating "The Event," a definition of which varies slightly but includes an instantaneous breakthrough to a place where there is more Light.
The New Order on the Horus-zone is probably the one envisioned by AC, redefined without a new definition by RTC, except this one is in digital format. Good.
P.S. Microsoft just announced their new Win 11 will contain "AI" to make this "faster and easier." A group of concerned folks has already sprung up.
Anyone who remembers his prediction of the bloody and violent nationwide food riots across the USA in the summer on 2020 (after China bought up all the world's food in response to the COVID pandemic) knows that @runelogix is a person to be taken seriously as one who knows what he is talking about!
I've tried multiple LLM's and I have made my own on my own hardware. Next up I plan on trying Falcon since it was released under a MIT license.
Oh nice surprise, a pro! I look forward to learning more about your results if you don't mind sharing with the community when the time is right. Thanks for linking me to that!
All 8=3s, right?
who am I to judge?
My concern is that at least one of them is a 7=4, having published his/her own lingo or hardware design and who may be considered the leader of a school of computing thought ... who is in touch with an 8=3 (who is incarnate somewhere - Ascended Masters need not apply), because without that link, we will see work done, but it will be inferior and will lead to the end of humanity.
Like I said I think you would be surprised, and more than you would even think. There is a whole social and cultural movement emerging now in the intersections of tech and media, movements within the blockchain (check out Cult DAO for example) promoting many different types of decentralized power structures, decentralized governance and decentralized finance ––and this is before we even get into the LLM side of things.
There most definitely has been a "holy war" declared on those power structures you mention, and wizards east and west, technologists, a few magicians, a few monks, are most definitely present I can personally confirm to my own satisfaction.
Yes, The Golden Dawn. Other folks are seeing it in religious and metaphysical terms. they are anticipating "The Event," a definition of which varies slightly but includes an instantaneous breakthrough to a place where there is more Light.
Yes kinda unbelievable as it literally happening on multiple levels. It kinda is that moment in history now, which personally I have been patiently waiting for quite some time 🙂
So of course it is the time for a fully decrypted Liber al vel Legis, for how else could it evolve into history without the narrative resolution to the glorious tension it caused in the previous epoch?
This is where our old friend Tim Leary turned out to be remarkably prescient.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
decentralized power structures, decentralized governance and decentralized finance
Ooh, good. My impression of what would be good came from some description I read that foretold the real "new age" in two words - "cottage industries."
There most definitely has been a "holy war" declared on those power structures you mention
I heard about it.
Gee Lordy....Another great singularity on the horizon...LLM's for breakfast now that we can crush the other side of the equation with earth shattering ram raming bits and bytes out of the apple!
Apple what apple, don't worry about food ...the grocery story will always bee there just like the bees but some ate threes till the dust around the pyramids of ponzi schemes glitter in the night of civilizations desert or dessert for the dow has become the dao or are we just talking the latest slight of hand to steal one's daily bread.
Economics is easy...Pay the farmer their due first then comes all wisdom to quote two timothy two six and seven....See how the quants and elelmmm's do with simple arithmetic...so it does not matter whether it is centralized or decentralized it all is about the first point of sale of raw materials, and thus principle starts with principle paying for the raw stuff enough so that is spent with some left over for the next cycle...Got Seed!...well at least the West is running out of ammunition on the eastern front...
So while you are at it with the AI programming and questions how about calculate the seven year debt jubilee... feed that into the equation since the start of the Fed, or since King Charles I was beheaded....
I will take Liber Legis with the mystery thank you!
Where I do not expect a computer program to solve the problems of that book, at least the program is not going to act as though it were the great pretender, even though there are those so enamored, or burdened or released... and it (AI) is also not going to be confronted with the spiritual question of aspirants whom might realize that there is a reason certain answers are kept silent....so as not to betray the cosmic equation~
So go ask the bot about what the wrong type of silence is?
So of course it is the time for a fully decrypted Liber al vel Legis, for how else could it evolve into history without the narrative resolution to the glorious tension it caused in the previous epoch?
This is where our old friend Tim Leary turned out to be remarkably prescient.
Dwtw
Can you please define what you mean by 'fully decrypted';
and elaborate on how this book is supposed to 'evolve'?
Litllwtw
O.L.
Can you please define what you mean by 'fully decrypted';
and elaborate on how this book is supposed to 'evolve'?
By fully decrypted I mean "resolved". And of course I mean this if, and only if, one views BOL as some sort of prophetic text that has relevance for humanity, a civilization building text.
The text presents itself as "unresolved" while making what appear as prophetic statements about the "future evolution" of humanity.
I don't think BOL will evolve as a text, the text will never change, but our understanding of the tension it carries with it as it hurdled into culture at the start of the 20th Century until it resolves into "Maat", using the parlance of Thelema, a golden age (what else is aeon of maat but a golden age?).
Liber al vel Legis brings "tension" to history, it brings "tearing things down", a deconstructive element, which is exactly what the 20th century brought, from music (rite of spring was 1906) to art (dada), even to philosophy and science, a revolution happened in the 20th century.
If we view BOL as prophetic text, then it pretty much nails the 20th century pretty well (from my own study, I say this)
But it is now the 21st century, what is emerging both culturally and technically is "regeneration", and I mean this as it is taking shape in commerce, finance, even governance. "deconstruction" into "regeneration". while those are also themes in occultism, they are actual dynamics that play out through civilizations.
So we should expect that "resolution" to the prophetic nature of the text to emerge as the aeon of Maat (golden age) emerges.
Liber al vel Legis will not change at all, but how we engage with it and how we use it will.
It should make "perfect sense" in the "new aeon of maat".
If, and only if, we view it as a prophetic civilization building text. And I do view it that way, but not saying everyone should.
If secret societies are not creating civilization building works, then they are worthless and a waste of time.
I do not think Liber al vel Legis is a waste of time.
I have learned so much from it, and all the time spent was well spent!
If Liber al vel Legis remains unresolved, then to the bins of history it shall go, because technically it is now outdated!
My impression of what would be good came from some description I read that foretold the real "new age" in two words - "cottage industries."
Really? Can't tell if you are being sarcastic 😆 but I suppose "cottage industry" could equate with decentralized power structures but where did you read this?
"Golden Age" mythos as I understand all have their root in the Shambhala mythologies from Hindu and Vajrayana. I assume "new age" means something similar, the "new age" as described as a publishing vertical however is all over the place.
.so it does not matter whether it is centralized or decentralized it all is about the first point of sale of raw materials, and thus principle starts with principle paying for the raw stuff enough so that is spent with some left over for the next cycle..
Well sure, but it does matter because your suggestion, which we will accept as absolutely true and the positive way to go, requires consensus agreement which is currently "centralized" so those decisions are not really made in any "plural" fashion, and the problem starts before farmer bob, because for farmer bob to get paid for his potatoes, you have to have a currency with which to buy them, and therein begins the issue with centralized power structures.
How does bob distribute his potatoes and how do currencies distribute back to bob in return? Those are design questions, not rhetorical ones.
The new golden age, if I may use the phrase, would deliver new ways for consensus to form through decentralized processes, and finance to be operated through decentralized forms including creating what is called "plural money".
Communities will be able to build, store, and create their own form of wealth which can be exchanged into a more universal currency if necessary.
Wealth distribution from solar energy being converted into direct wealth will allow efficient distribution of resources.
For that to happen, decentralization is necessary if one is a designer creating the new systems.
There are emerging algorithms which address this, I would say 1 - 2 years and it could have saturation globally with AI's acting as the "collective intelligence" engine, guiding all conflicts into a resolving format.
So go ask the bot about what the wrong type of silence is?
Silence is personal, and not a consensus topic. There is time for study and deliberation, there is time for silence. There is no competition between them.
I think it is probably best if we remove the words "computer, AI, bot, and LLM" from the conversation so what is "actually" happening can be made clear.
LLMs, computer networks, etc are simply facilitating "collective intelligence" or basically rapid intelligence increase.
So, does it seem wise to consult "collective intelligence of the species" when researching, exploring, speculating or is it better to just stay silent, not engage with society and its problems?
Of course it makes sense to design, engineer, produce, deliberate in a way that can produce mutual resolution between conflicting views.
Of course it makes sense to distribute wealth efficiently – realistically every single individual in the world could have equal access to billionaire levels of wealth from a design perspective. We actually have the technical engineering capabilities of actually producing such a world, and never before in our collective history has this ever been possible before now.
Only thing standing in the way of that emerging is really just everyone's dumb political ideas and fear paranoias about the "other".
Can we get them out of the way?
yes, decentralized consensus structures can do that. LLMs and AI can scale that quickly.
There is division hither homeward.
The source of that division can be rebooted.
tldr:
The 20th century was the tearing down, the "Critique". BOL said that in 1904, in 2004 it already happened.
Now that everything has been torn down and torn apart, time to build!
The 21st century is less about critiquing power and more about asking "what does the resolution look like?"
Liber al vel Legis needs a 21st Century update!
The update is contained within the text!
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
Apologies for double post.
Regarding what I mean by "decrypt".
What I think i really mean as that it needs to be decrypted as a literary work of art, it needs to be understood as a unique form of literature, thereby it must be analyzed from that perspective.
I personally believe that it is one of the greatest works of literature in the history of the world, its inherent magical nature as a literary device can most certainly should be unlocked because the entire book is asking the reader to do just that!
The comment by Crowley is the greatest literary prank on the reader ever devised by man.
Just look at the tension the "comment" has created in Thelemic communities, all terrified to discuss the text for fear of being shunned for their "religious views" by other Thelemites; a type of activity that only occurs in strict and orthodox religious environments, the act of shunning––the complete opposite message of the entire text.
Just ask yourself, as a Thelemic Crowleyite, how many times someone in the community used that view to simply discard your viewpoint on the basis of what some religious text says?
Utterly brilliant interactive theater, that book!
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
Of course it makes sense to distribute wealth efficiently – realistically every single individual in the world could have equal access to billionaire levels of wealth from a design perspective. We actually have the technical engineering capabilities of actually producing such a world, and never before in our collective history has this ever been possible before now.
Only thing standing in the way of that emerging is really just everyone's dumb political ideas and fear paranoias about the "other".
Dwtw
As you may be aware, Buckminster Fuller was saying this exact same thing over 50 years ago.
Litlluw
O.L.
As you may be aware, Buckminster Fuller was saying this exact same thing over 50 years ago.
exactly.
He saw the distributive patterns, but technology was not there to express it.
He predicted "it", The World Game, would occur around the year 2000, which does correspond to the internet's rise. But even then we still did not have it.
But we do have it now. Enough to build upon, and those builders have already started, many of them never even heard of bucky.
China even announced the construction of a global energy grid by 2048.
So, let's just assume that something like Bucky's vision does happen.
What does that do to history, when the entire world becomes a decentralized energy to wealth grid where competition and the nation state level is no longer necessary?
History ends, that is what happens to history. History is just the stories of the rise and fall of nation states.
Global hyperstructures are going to be here really fast.
And predicting this forward to backward, what would liber al vel legis look like to citizens of a 2060 world under this condition?
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
Really? Can't tell if you are being sarcastic
but I suppose "cottage industry" could equate with decentralized
Exactly. What you described is in-line with cottage industries. A bunch of little mini-factories instead of one massive industrial center. Transportation of products will, of course, be required. It's just a metaphor in my mind, but it reminds me of the final words of Mr White ...
"We now move to decentralization"
Wealth distribution from solar energy being converted into direct wealth will allow efficient distribution of resources.
For that to happen, decentralization is necessary if one is a designer creating the new systems.
There are emerging algorithms which address this, I would say 1 - 2 years and it could have saturation globally with AI's acting as the "collective intelligence" engine, guiding all conflicts into a resolving format.
Dwtw
This is in line with the Word of the Aeon which is Katalysis, meaning Dissolution.
In classical Greek, the word indicated
tldr:
The 20th century was the tearing down, the "Critique". BOL said that in 1904, in 2004 it already happened.
Now that everything has been torn down and torn apart, time to build!
The 21st century is less about critiquing power and more about asking "what does the resolution look like?"
Liber al vel Legis needs a 21st Century update!
The update is contained within the text!
The update is more specifically contained in Liber MA vel Laudum. As the purpose for Liber AL has been accomplished and the Aeon of MA begun in 2020, the new dispensation of Liber MA embodies the evolution of the text of Liber AL vel Legis.
Litllwtw
O.L.
As the purpose for Liber AL has been accomplished and the Aeon of MA begun in 2020
This, of course, was for you, and not necessarily other people. For example, the statement quoted above could be applied to me, another person, except the year would be 1984.
Everybody's got their own "True Timetable."
93,
Relative to what concerns technical issues as I note that I did not write what @threefold31 quoted in his night owl posting of 07/06/2023 3:58 am...unless I have really lost my mind...
So in this thread about computer programs...it would seem we have run into a technical difficulty....
Thanks so much for the great site!
93/93
Some form of Katalysis would have to occur for Bucky's vision to become a reality.
Governments would have to be part of the solution and not the problem. Bucky would just remove the governments and have technocrats solve the problems logically; obviously a utopian idea, but not too different from having AI make the most rational decisions that benefit everyone.
This is where there is actually alarming progress being made. Governments are just composed of individuals, so while the gov body is swamped in bureaucracy, there are flexible hyperstructures that can allow individuals, corps, institutions, etc etc to all function as a hyper organization that has interdependent components which can function as work arounds. This is happening on a smaller scale at the moment, but quickly will scale out in the next 10 years
In principle, there could be a single collective intelligence AI system, contained within "mutual resolution" that govs and individuals would use alike. It is conceivable that the entire process could be managed by an AI
Folks like Balaji are promoting the creation of new "network states".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VeH7qKZr0WI @shiva give that a listen, it is very very long, but it give you a lot of details you will enjoy listening to
The update is more specifically contained in Liber MA vel Laudum. As the purpose for Liber AL has been accomplished and the Aeon of MA begun in 2020, the new dispensation of Liber MA embodies the evolution of the text of Liber AL vel Legis.
Curious, I am not familiar with this text Liber MA vel Laudum. I do remember previous posts of yours, you and I were arriving at the same conclusions but using entirely different methods. I do agree Liber al has served its purpose, but would love to learn more of this work you mention in Liber MA.
2020 sounds about right!
Everybody's got their own "True Timetable."
Well, its always good to be scientific about these things. If there is a discovery, if it is useful it should be able to make some sort of prediction, and if the prediction comes true, success is your proof, no?
Liber al vel Legis represents an era (or aeon if it pleases) of tearing down. 2020 was a remarkable shift that did leave everyone in the world isolated and separated, which is its own unique alchemical stage, at scale.
"If you have come to help me, then you are wasting your time, but if you are here because your liberation is bound together with mine, then let us work together." Lilla Watson
93,
Relative to what concerns technical issues as I note that I did not write what @threefold31 quoted in his night owl posting of 07/06/2023 3:58 am...
Dwtw
My mistake I edited the wrong header; it was Sange Wangchuck I was replying to. Thanks for pointing that out.
As the purpose for Liber AL has been accomplished and the Aeon of MA begun in 2020
This, of course, was for you, and not necessarily other people. For example, the statement quoted above could be applied to me, another person, except the year would be 1984.
Everybody's got their own "True Timetable."
Yes, i am speaking in terms of the Aeons, not individuals. Liber AL will continue to be relevant (or not) to people as long or until they (dis)connect with it. The same is true of the Bible. The reports of its demise have been greatly exaggerated, and Xtianity is not going anywhere anytime soon, even though its 'aeon' has been over for a while now.
Curious, I am not familiar with this text Liber MA vel Laudum. I do remember previous posts of yours, you and I were arriving at the same conclusions but using entirely different methods. I do agree Liber al has served its purpose, but would love to learn more of this work you mention in Liber MA.
2020 sounds about right!
The text of Liber MA can be found here:
Liber MA vel Laudum sub figura CCXXI
A Lashtal thread concerning it is here:
Litllwtw
O.L.